please remove our email adress!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [EMAIL PROTECTED]
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 5:01 PM Subject: evolution digest, Vol 1 #301 - 14 msgs > Send evolution mailing list submissions to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You can reach the person managing the list at > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific > than "Re: Contents of evolution digest..." > > > Today's Topics: > > 1. Re: Reading Multiple Messages (Jason Tackaberry) > 2. Re: Evolution 1.2.4 crashes in different cases (Not Zed) > 3. Re: filters.xml (Not Zed) > 4. Re: How to sort by label? (Not Zed) > 5. Re: Date header bug? (Not Zed) > 6. Re: How to sort by label? (Mark R. Bowyer) > 7. RE: getting 1.4.X on RH 7.3, removing gnome breaks hpoj (=?iso-8859-2?Q?Jaros=B3aw_Nozderko?=) > 8. Re: Small, but odd thing... (Not Zed) > 9. Re: Printing Problem (Not Zed) > 10. GnomePrintCupsPlugin-WARNING (Tig Kerkman) > 11. Problem with Inbox (Michael J. Rensing) > 12. Re: filters.xml (Michael J. Rensing) > 13. Re: Problem with Inbox (guenther) > 14. Calendar server ? (Michael Agbaglo) > > --__--__-- > > Message: 1 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Reading Multiple Messages > From: Jason Tackaberry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Yu-Hui Calvin Liu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 03 Jul 2003 07:40:14 -0400 > > On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 01:29, Yu-Hui Calvin Liu wrote: > > But after I read them, they're still there. If I restart evolution, the > > "unread" vfolder will be empty. That's what I want. > > If you expunge a vFolder (Actions | Expunge, or CTRL-E), it will cause > all messages that no longer match the vFolders rules to go away. No > need to restart. > > Cheers, > Jason. > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 2 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Evolution 1.2.4 crashes in different cases > From: Not Zed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Frank Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Organization: > Date: 03 Jul 2003 22:39:48 +0930 > > On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 16:46, Frank Becker wrote: > > Am Mit, 2003-07-02 um 23.28 schrieb Mark Gordon: > > > A stack trace from the evolution-mail component might be useful. See > > > instructions at http://support.ximian.com/q?65 > > > > I did it. > > > Thread 1 (Thread 1024 (LWP 4571)): > > #0 0x40fedbb0 in poll () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > #1 0x40e1ef19 in g_main_is_running () from /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0 > > #2 0x40e1e8cd in g_get_current_time () from /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0 > > #3 0x40e1ec7c in g_main_run () from /usr/lib/libglib-1.2.so.0 > > #4 0x40d3f7e7 in gtk_main () from /usr/lib/libgtk-1.2.so.0 > > #5 0x40289ebd in bonobo_main () from /usr/lib/libbonobo.so.2 > > #6 0x08090e3a in main () > > #7 0x40f3e14f in __libc_start_main () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > #0 0x40fedbb0 in poll () from /lib/libc.so.6 > > There should be more threads than that? > > With version 1.2.x you need to run gdb on 'evolution-mail', and use > 'thread apply all bt' to get the backtrace. > > FWIW installing the same version of gnomevfs might not help, if that is > the problem, perhaps an older version could be tried? > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 3 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] filters.xml > From: Not Zed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Michael Rensing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Evolution User Mailing-List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: > Date: 03 Jul 2003 22:46:00 +0930 > > On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 18:12, Xavier Bestel wrote: > > Le jeu 03/07/2003 � 01:48, Michael Rensing a �crit : > > > Now that evolution appears to have the ability to pipe messages to > > > scripts, I'm thinking of shutting down procmail and letting evolution do > > > all my filtering. The problem is that I've got a LOT of filter rules > > > defined in procmail. It looks like I'm in for a lot of mouse clicking. > > > > > > One of the things that could help would be to edit the filters.xml file > > > directly. Is it safe to do this, or would it screw up evolution? > > > > I've already done that, it works well. I didn't even need to restart > > Evo, the changes applied instantly. > > Nod, they're read every time filtering occurs. > > Be careful not to break the xml file in any way though, although i guess > at worst it will just not filter at all. > > I'm impressed (well, surprised) evolution's filtering stuff would > adequately replace procmail, tho i guess it depends on the case. > > Also note that evo can't yet use a script as a filter (i.e. the script > can't alter the message), only as a test. > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 4 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] How to sort by label? > From: Not Zed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Mark R. Bowyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Arthur S. Alexion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Organization: > Date: 03 Jul 2003 22:55:18 +0930 > > On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 20:29, Mark R. Bowyer wrote: > > On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 07:47, Arthur S. Alexion wrote: > > > ... Vfolders -- IMO Evolution's best unique feature -- work much > > > better for me in a situation where I want to easily group labels or > > > other characteristics. ... > > > > Sorry to be pedantic, but this isn't a feature unique to or new in Evo. > > It first appeared, to my knowledge, in CDE's "DtMail" application, there > > called "Views". I'm addicted to them to help me sort through my email > > in the morning, so I can deal with important customer emails quickly > > first, and then read through all mail to different email alias topics > > later, in little groups. > > Just dont let marketing hear you say it :) > > Someone told me about something called Rome, i think, from memory(?), > some Solaris product, years ago, which also had views. > > > > It was the fact that Evo had vfolders, so I could migrate my Views rules > > over and still use that functionality, that sold me on Evolution over > > all the other mail clients available to me under Gnome. =O) > > Good to hear it proved adequate in that regard. > > > As to the original question, no, unfortunately you can't sort on label, > you can only sort on things which can be set as columns in the view. > Its something we should probably remember to add for 1.6. > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 5 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Date header bug? > From: Not Zed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Mike Dougherty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Evolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: > Date: 03 Jul 2003 23:03:21 +0930 > > > It works in 1.2.2 here fine too. > > Is this from a message on an imap server? We might get the date by a > different mechanism that relies on the server parsing it, for the > message list view. > > > On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 02:59, Mike Dougherty wrote: > > I did a quick search in Bugzilla and didn't see anything that pertains > > to this. I'm not sure if it's a bug in Evolution or not. > > > > It seems that the date column in Evolution's mail view (not really > > sure what the name of this is) does display the date in certain > > circumstances. At the moment the only difference I can identify is the > > format of the date. When formatted as "Tue, 1 Jul 2003 10:23:46 -0700" > > it appears as "10:23 AM", which is expected. However, when formatted > > as "01 Jul 2003 10:14:05 -0700" it appears as a "?". I did a quick > > check with Mutt and it sees that date just fine so I would assume "01 > > Jul 2003 10:14:05 -0700" is a valid date format. > > > > Advice? > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 6 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] How to sort by label? > From: "Mark R. Bowyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Not Zed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: "Mark R. Bowyer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > "Arthur S. Alexion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Date: 03 Jul 2003 14:36:43 +0100 > > > --=-U6uwWaV5LhmJ7u6nKgP0 > Content-Type: text/plain > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 14:25, Not Zed wrote: > > Just dont let marketing hear you say it :) > > Don't worry - I don't talk to Marketing ;O) > > > Someone told me about something called Rome, i think, from memory(?), > > some Solaris product, years ago, which also had views. > > That would have been "Roam", which as the name suggests, was intended > for Sun's road warriors to use for low-bandwidth email access, I think.=20 > I've never used it, but heard that too =3DO) > > Ta, > --=20 > o o mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > /v\ark R. Bowyer http://www.bowyer.screaming.net [EMAIL PROTECTED] > `-' --------------------------------------- /"\ > ...fingerprint =3D 7924 9E9E 7B91 225E B065 \ / ASCII Ribbon Campaign=20 > 1024D/19BC72F6 39D0 551D ABE6 1514 0DC1 X Against HTML Mail > -------------------------------------------- / \=20 > CROMARTY (n.) The brittle sludge which clings to the top of ketchup > bottles and plastic tomatoes in nasty cafes. =20 > > --=-U6uwWaV5LhmJ7u6nKgP0 > Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc > Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (SunOS) > > iD8DBQA/BDFoVR2r5hUUDcERAl+6AKDUxyPsxr1oURM5X+zcfBeQrFwNyACfUKJm > 90ke4DIPo995KhS7BN4B380= > =BR+p > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > --=-U6uwWaV5LhmJ7u6nKgP0-- > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 7 > Subject: RE: [Evolution] getting 1.4.X on RH 7.3, removing gnome breaks hpoj > Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 15:49:25 +0200 > From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Jaros=B3aw_Nozderko?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Evolution List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I wish I knew it before... OK, is there an easy way=20 > to downgrade from 1.4 to 1.2.4 using Red Carpet ? > > Regards, > Jarek > > Jaroslaw Nozderko > GSM +48 601131870 / Kapsch (22) 6075013 > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > IT/CCBS/RS - Analyst Programmer > =20 > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Mark Gordon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:51 AM > > To: Zot O'Connor > > Cc: Evolution List > > Subject: Re: [Evolution] getting 1.4.X on RH 7.3, removing=20 > > gnome breaks > > hpoj > >=20 > >=20 > > Updating to Evolution 1.4 on Red Hat Linux 7.3 without concurrently > > updating to XD2 is not currently recommended. It requires enough > > changes to GNOME, for example, that unless one is running KDE to start > > with, it's likely to break things. This might get resolved at some > > point, but for now, my advice is to either stick with Evolution 1.2.4, > > or upgrade to XD2, or upgrade to Red Hat Linux 8.0 (for which the > > Evolution-only install is much more feasible). > >=20 > > Red Carpet can take a lot of time trying to resolve especially > > complicated dependency situations. It could probably be more=20 > > efficient, > > but I suspect it just took that long to come up with an advised course > > of action. > >=20 > > -Mark Gordon > >=20 > > On Wed, 2003-07-02 at 18:36, Zot O'Connor wrote: > > > red-carpet has a few errors lately. > > >=20 > > > It fails on finding a directory for evo 1.2, and connector=20 > > 1.2. How do > > > I tell it to stop looking? > > >=20 > > > More important is when I try to get evo 1.4 I get: > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > gdm 1:2.2.5.4-1.ximian.25 3.08 MB=20 > > > depends on: gnome-core > > > gnome-core-devel 1:1.4.1-1.ximian.4 3.94 MB=20 > > > depends on: gnome-core > > > hpoj 0.90-1 1.10 MB=20 > > > hpoj-devel 0.90-1 46 KB =20 > > > depends on: hpoj > > > libglade2-devel 1.99.9-2 312 KB =20 > > > conflicts with: libglade2 > > > libsane-hpoj 0.90-1 136 KB =20 > > > depends on: hpoj > > > xojpanel 0.90-1 88 KB =20 > > > depends on: hpoj =20 > > >=20 > > > This is a RH 7.3 box. I need hpoj for my printing. =20 > > Archives/Google do > > > not show any one else noticing this, and red-carpet does=20 > > not say why it > > > is being removed. > > >=20 > > > It also loads > > > cups 1:1.1.14-15.4 4.07 MB --=09 > > > needed by: libgnomecups=09 > > > =09 > > > which I do not really want since I run lpr-ng successfully. > > >=20 > > > libgnomecups 0.1.4-0.ximian.4.2 31 KB --=09 > > > needed by: libgnomeprint22=09 > > >=20 > > > libgnomeprint22 2.3.0.cvs.9-0.ximian.4.2 255 KB --=09 > > > needed by: evolution =09 > > > =09 > > > seems to be where this is coming from. > > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Also red-carpet seems to be taking up 10 minutes and all=20 > > the CPU and all > > > the memory while determining dependicies. Is this due to=20 > > gnome2? Is it > > > looping? > > >=20 > > > Thanks. > > >=20 > > > --=20 > > > Zot O'Connor > > >=20 > > > http://www.ZotConsulting.com > > > http://www.WhiteKnightHackers.com > >=20 > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > >=20 > > --__--__-- > > Message: 8 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Small, but odd thing... > From: Not Zed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Mike Kestner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Eric Lambart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Evolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: > Date: 03 Jul 2003 23:21:14 +0930 > > On Sat, 2003-06-28 at 13:47, Mike Kestner wrote: > > On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 21:55, Eric Lambart wrote: > > > On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 15:47, Cliff Wells wrote: > > > > I notice that when I resize the headers on the message list pane, it > > > > hits my hard drive constantly (my drive is a little noisy during i/o). > > > > Sort of eerie. > > > > > > This is an old, known bug dating back to even before the 1.0 release, I > > > believe. It's in bugzilla, but I think it's been forgotten about. > > > > Not forgotten about, as my response to another person who reported this > > to the list in the last couple weeks will attest. It's just way, way, > > way down on the "bugfixes that would make an big impact" list. > > > > If anyone is looking for a nice little evo (gal really) hacking project, > > I'd be happy to point them in the right direction, though. Maybe > > rodrigo could put this one on the gnome-es bug day roster? > > can't you just drop it in a timeout handler? 500ms should be about > right ... > > > http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=40482 > > > > Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 9 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Printing Problem > From: Not Zed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: dennis tuchler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: Ximian Evolution Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: > Date: 03 Jul 2003 23:30:29 +0930 > > > We use gnome libraries, so the first place to look would probably be > other gnome applications that print using the same libraries. e.g. > openoffice.org. > > Another thing you could try is printing to a postscript file and dumping > that to the printer. > > On Fri, 2003-06-27 at 02:34, dennis tuchler wrote: > > This concerns printing from e-mail caught by Evolution 1.4, operating > > under SuSE 8.2. The printer is a Lexmark Optra E310. The printer > > connection is through CUPS. > > > > When I right click on a piece of e-mail and select "print", I get an > > error light on the printer. When I copy the contents of the message to > > Kwrite abd print from there, no problem. > > > > I am sure that there is a setting I am missing. Would someone help me? > > > > Thanks > > > > dj tuchler > > > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 10 > From: Tig Kerkman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Evolution Mail List <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Organization: City of Kenosha > Date: 03 Jul 2003 10:21:16 -0500 > Subject: [Evolution] GnomePrintCupsPlugin-WARNING > > Evolution 1.4 on Redhat 8.0. > > I have upgraded to Evolution 1.4 from 1.2 via red-carpet. Everything is > working except that I cannot print. The error I get at the command line > is: > > (evolution:4702): GnomePrintCupsPlugin-WARNING **: The CUPS printer > trn1n could not be created > > > > Then I get a Segmentation fault and evolution crashes. > > I can print from other applications, and from the command line. > > HELP..... > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 11 > Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 08:35:44 -0700 > From: "Michael J. Rensing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: evolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: [Evolution] Problem with Inbox > > Hi all, I'm having some trouble getting my Inbox to work the way I think > it should. I'm receiving my mail using fetchmail which puts it into the > standard /var/spool/mail/michael file. > > I've configured an account in Evo with server type "Local Delivery", > which points to /var/spool/mail/michael. However, nothing ever shows up > in the Inbox. > > If I configure an account with server type "Standard Unix mbox spool or > directory", Evo sees the mail in that Inbox. Problem is that it adds to > the clutter to have a separate account for this when I thought that the > standard Inbox should handle this. > > Does anyone have any idea what's going on? Why can't I see any mail in > the Evolution Local Folders -> Inbox? > > Regards, > Michael > -- > Michael J. Rensing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 12 > Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 08:47:11 -0700 > From: "Michael J. Rensing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Evolution] filters.xml > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, 2003-07-03 at 06:16, Not Zed wrote: > > > I'm impressed (well, surprised) evolution's filtering stuff would > > adequately replace procmail, tho i guess it depends on the case. > > Well, I'm not sure that it's adequate yet. I'm testing with a small > subset of my procmail filters, and it does seem to be rather slow. > > I'm trying to find a way to have mail notification (or at least have the > new message count and bold font appear) whenever new messages appear in > a number of mailboxes. Evo doesn't update automatically for local > folders, and I keep having to manually check five or so different boxes > for new mail. > > > Also note that evo can't yet use a script as a filter (i.e. the script > > can't alter the message), only as a test. > > Already noted. This is a shortcoming, but not really for me. Luckily the > scripts I'm using can all do their job by checking the return code. > > If altering the message were necessary, I guess one could get really > sneaky and have the script do the alteration and re-submit the message > to the mail spool and dump the unaltered version in /dev/null. The > filter system could be set up to recognize the modified message second > time around and deal with it appropriately. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > -- > Michael J. Rensing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 13 > Subject: Re: [Evolution] Problem with Inbox > From: guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Michael J. Rensing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: evolution <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 03 Jul 2003 17:50:18 +0200 > > > > Hi all, I'm having some trouble getting my Inbox to work the way I think > > it should. I'm receiving my mail using fetchmail which puts it into the > > standard /var/spool/mail/michael file. > [...] > > > Does anyone have any idea what's going on? Why can't I see any mail in > > the Evolution Local Folders -> Inbox? > > > This is a known issue and will be fixed in 1.4.1 (well, 1.4.2), which > will be released soon. > > See bugzilla for more and a workaround: > http://bugzilla.ximian.com/show_bug.cgi?id=43974 > > ...guenther > > > -- > char *t="[EMAIL PROTECTED]"; > main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1: > (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}} > > > --__--__-- > > Message: 14 > Date: Thu, 03 Jul 2003 17:10:57 +0200 > From: Michael Agbaglo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Evolution] Calendar server ? > > Hi ! > > I'd like to sync my calendar among serveral machines. I heard that > 'wombat' is responsible for calendar and contact management. Where do I > find detailed information on it ? I there a non-proprietary solution too > ? ( I'm using LDAP for my contacts ...) > > M. > > > > > --__--__-- > > > > > End of evolution Digest _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
