and did you click "OK" to accept it anyway? the cert is most assuredly bad. there's no doubt in my mind.
Jeff On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 15:06, Andreas W�st wrote: > Hi Jeffrey > > On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 18:06, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > just because other clients connect without warning you does not mean > > that they are doing the right thing :-) > > Well, the hotline staff tried various apps, also on other platforms, > including the ususal suspects.. > > > if evolution says the certificate is bad, then it means that the mozilla > > nss ssl library says it is bad. this suggests to me that mozilla would > > give the same error. > > > > are you by any chance connecting to multiple ssl servers? > > No. Only one. > > > check that > > they don't have the same ssl certificate. we reported this problem to > > the moz devs a good 6 months to a year ago and were told that it is > > invalid for 2+ servers to share the same ssl cert and thus they felt > > that this was not a bug. > > I've even renamed the certificate in .camel_certs into .old, so > evolution could go for a new one, but it still reported that the > signature would be bad. -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
