Hi Jeffrey

On Tue, 2003-10-21 at 18:06, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:

> just because other clients connect without warning you does not mean
> that they are doing the right thing :-)
> 
> if evolution says the certificate is bad, then it means that the mozilla
> nss ssl library says it is bad. this suggests to me that mozilla would
> give the same error.

Ok, I've tried with Mozilla Mail. It flawlessly worked! No fscking about
the certificate. And netstat told me that it was really a ssl connection
(port 995).

But Evolution still gave me a bad signature error. So the failure
doesn't seem to lie with the cert..

What does that now mean?

-- 
Best wishes,
Andi

_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Reply via email to