On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 08:10, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote: > On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 07:10, Tony Earnshaw wrote: > > ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 12.07 skrev guenther: > [...] > > > You can entirely disabling filtering through SpamAssassin in Evolution. > > > No one is forced to. IMHO it is a better approach in UN*X land to use > > > applications, that already exist and proved to work very well. SA does > > > for you. There is no need to implement a Bayesian filter for any mailer > > > out there. > > > > This I don't understand. One of the strongest assets of SA is a Bayesian > > filter. > > I think you've misunderstood Guenther. He's not slamming Bayesian > filters, he's saying there's no need to implement one in the > mail client when there are several standalone implementations > out there.
while the mailer hackers agree with you, we were overruled by the mass of users who demanded this feature. So, this is pretty much moot. Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
