ons, 31.03.2004 kl. 16.28 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast: > > I think you've misunderstood Guenther. He's not slamming Bayesian > > filters, he's saying there's no need to implement one in the > > mail client when there are several standalone implementations > > out there. > > while the mailer hackers agree with you, we were overruled by the mass > of users who demanded this feature. So, this is pretty much moot.
This is the point at which I left this discussion. I honor and respect Jeff's statement. For me, Evo will always be Evo. She will continue to sport warts and blemishes, and I will continue to love her and have to cope with a multitude of user clients which will include Outlook Express (retch), Outlook (double retch), Mozilla, Kmail, Eudora, Pegasus, Pine, Mutt, SquirrelMail and more. However, as a mailadmin I have to implement, apart from attempted anti-forgery and other shit, effective site-wide spam and virus filtering for them all. This I shall continue to do with site-wide Postfix-proxy-amavisd-new-LDAP-SpamAssassin (which also supports virus filtering and one hell of a lot more). Everything that any MUA client supports is purely incidental. As mailadmin for my sites (mostly a gang of Dutch high schools), I'm ultimately responsible. --Tonni -- mail: billy - at - billy.demon.nl http://www.billy.demon.nl _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
