It would only be for a dedicated IMAP server for alarms that would only have a dozen accounts at the very most.
Ted On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 11:28 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > Please do not do this. > > Already at 1 minute it can cause excessive load on a big server, we > don't want evo being blamed for causing server administrators > headaches. > > If you need to find out somethng more often than once a minute, use a > phone :) > > Michael > > On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 21:13 -0400, Ted Kaczmarek wrote: > > What would it take to be able to check for new mail in second > > increments.? I am not a coder but would be willing to give it a whirl, > > but figure would be better to ask the guru's first :-) > > > > Thanks, > > Ted > > > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > > Michael Zucchi > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Ximian Evolution and > Free Software Developer > > > Novell, Inc. _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
