Use gconf and set the timeout setting manually in seconds, that might work.  We wont be supporting any such option.

If you need greater than per minute alarms, you should totally not be using email as the notification mechanism.

On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 07:53 -0400, Ted Kaczmarek wrote:
It would only be for a dedicated IMAP server for alarms that would only
have a dozen accounts at the very most. 

Ted
On Fri, 2004-05-14 at 11:28 +0800, Not Zed wrote:
> 
> Please do not do this.
> 
> Already at 1 minute it can cause excessive load on a big server, we
> don't want evo being blamed for causing server administrators
> headaches.
> 
> If you need to find out somethng more often than once a minute, use a
> phone :)
> 
> Michael
> 
> On Thu, 2004-05-13 at 21:13 -0400, Ted Kaczmarek wrote: 
> > What would it take to be able to check for new mail in second
> > increments.? I am not a coder but would be willing to give it a whirl,
> > but figure would be better to ask the guru's first :-)
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Ted
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 
> Michael Zucchi
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Ximian Evolution and
> Free Software Developer
> 
> 
> Novell, Inc.

_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Michael Zucchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Ximian Evolution and Free Software Developer


Novell, Inc.

<<attachment: zed-48.small.jpg>>

Reply via email to