On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 23:25 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > On Thu, 2004-05-06 at 00:07 -0400, Andrew Conkling wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-05-05 at 20:21 -0500, Ron Johnson wrote: > > While I don't have such cogent reasons for saying, I still think > > plain-text email is viable enough that a widely-used program like > > Evolution should support it and I think it'd be narrow-minded for a > > few's opinions to dictate its options. > > Maybe I'm misreading you, but Evo *does* support text email. > By default, I think, since I don't remember clicking an "I like > retro-computing" check-box.
You're not misreading, I'm just unclear. I meant to say that Evo should be supporting the default of text email, as in through such opportunities as "user prefers text email" or something. Not Zed made it sound as if the current option should be changed, while I would say that a binary "either likes HTML or text" is a suitable option. _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
