On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 09:16 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 11:55 +0100, Bram Mertens wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 16:38 +0800, Not Zed wrote: > > [...] > > > There's really not much else to it, your best bet is the source, or > > > ask specific questions on this list. There are many references in the > > > archives to "migration" of data and backing up data, its basically the > > > #1 Frequently-asked & answered-Question. > > > > Sorry but I'd have to disagree for version 2.x, what files did or did > > not have to be backed up for version 1.x has indeed been covered many > > times on this list. However the file-structure has changed from 1.x to > > 2.x which is why I asked this question again a couple of days ago (my > > message "backing up evolution 2.x" of Wed, 16 Feb 2005). > Huh? ITs been discussed about 20 times AT LEAST.
Sorry, I did search my and the online archives of this list and all I have found is Celsun's thread I mentioned yesterday. I've been looking further back into my archive and found another thread which indeed answers one of my questions: On 26 December, Ron Johnson replied to Rick DeNatale that ~/.evolution/cache doesn't have to be backed up. So indeed I missed that one. However I can't find a single message between 1 November and now detailing which files can be safely omitted from a backup. Can anybody please tell me which of the following files in ~/.evolution/mail/local/ will be rebuilt by evo and can therefore be deleted (for POP3 accounts)? *.cmeta *.ev-summary *.ibex.index *.ibex.index.data TIA Bram -- # Mertens Bram "M8ram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux User #349737 # # debian testing kernel 2.6.8-1-686 i686 512MB RAM # # 10:18:21 up 14 days, 14:05, 11 users, load average: 0.59, 0.49, 0.49 # _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [email protected] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
