On 12 Apr 2001 11:28:26 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> Yea, we've known about this for a while but it's not anywhere close to
> being ready yet. Currently, I don't think it does much more than sign
> data, so it needs to get quite a lot farther before we can use it. Also,
> it only talks to gpg so that doesn't help us when it comes to the other
> pgp implementations :-(
Well, GPG does everything PGP does and more, plus it's free... Is
there any particular reason why we might want to actually support the
older PGP?
--
Ettore
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
