On 13 Apr 2001 07:13:22 -0400, Ettore Perazzoli wrote:
> On 12 Apr 2001 11:28:26 -0400, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote:
> > Yea, we've known about this for a while but it's not anywhere close to
> > being ready yet. Currently, I don't think it does much more than sign
> > data, so it needs to get quite a lot farther before we can use it. Also,
> > it only talks to gpg so that doesn't help us when it comes to the other
> > pgp implementations :-(
>
> Well, GPG does everything PGP does and more, plus it's free... Is
> there any particular reason why we might want to actually support the
> older PGP?
Probably because there are many people who have and use PGP.
Personally, I could care less if you got rid of the PGP but I can
probably think of several people who wouldn't like that idea at all.
--
Sejal Patel
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.helixcode.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
