On Tue, 2001-12-04 at 01:19, Chris Ball wrote: > On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:40:48PM -0800, Ujwal S. Sathyam wrote: > > This sounds really interesting. > > .. furthermore, it sounds like a wonderful business model, given > that nothing else really does this yet. It seems that even Evolution > doesn't, from the examples of discussion on here that I've seen - for > example, our calendaring at the moment is p2p, right? How will Evo(GPL) > handle this when Evo(Proprietary) appears? Is it really planned to > have a version of iCal that wanders around client->client as well as a > version that talks to servers? >
I assume that the connector will be a plugin that uses bonobo to do it's stuff. Therefore everything in evo will still be the same. What I would like to see is a evolution server that's GPL'ed and then a plugin to it for outlook-capability. That plugin can be proprietary for all I care. In my company most people are running either outlook or evolution but there is no way we will install a windows-server just for serving calendars and the like. /Erik -- Erik Bågfors | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Supporter of free software | GSM +46 733 279 273 fingerprint: 6666 A85B 95D3 D26B 296B 6C60 4F32 2C0B 693D 6E32 _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
