On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 20:10, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 13:20, Michael Rothwell wrote:
> > 5) Integrated PGP encryption > > Got it! Woo! But the integration could be a little tighter. This is > > probably as much a problem with GnuPG as Evo. > > Yeah. The right way to do it would be to integrate the keys into the > addressbook (and make that general enough that you can implement S/MIME > encryption on top of that too), and somehow link that to the pgp key > management. Yes, would be great. But please, please, please get MIME handling right first. GPG integration is broken if signed multipart msgs won't verify. Also, more general, if I save a mail from evo and diff it with the mail from the mailspool, the diff MUST imho be zero (perhaps modulo some evo special headers). cheers -- vbi
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
