On Wed, 2002-04-10 at 04:12, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 14:19, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder wrote: > > On Tue, 2002-04-09 at 20:10, Ettore Perazzoli wrote: > > > On Sat, 2002-04-06 at 13:20, Michael Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > 5) Integrated PGP encryption > > > > Got it! Woo! But the integration could be a little tighter. This is > > > > probably as much a problem with GnuPG as Evo. > > > > > > Yeah. The right way to do it would be to integrate the keys into the > > > addressbook (and make that general enough that you can implement S/MIME > > > encryption on top of that too), and somehow link that to the pgp key > > > management. > > > > Yes, would be great. But please, please, please get MIME handling right > > first. GPG integration is broken if signed multipart msgs won't verify.
Sorry, this isn't MIME handling not being right, its PGP assuming incorrect things about mail transfer that we have to work around. > > Also, more general, if I save a mail from evo and diff it with the mail > > from the mailspool, the diff MUST imho be zero (perhaps modulo some evo > > special headers). > > It's a non-trivial problem to solve... but feel free to send patches our > way, we'll be glad to accept! > > Jeff > > > > > cheers > > -- vbi > > > -- > Jeffrey Stedfast > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
