the bnf grammar says a mailbox is:
mailbox ::= "INBOX" | astring That makes it pretty clear. On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 21:02, Martin Skj�ldebrand wrote: > Hi, > > Further to the problem I reported friday, I skimmed the IMAP RFC and found > > 5.1. Mailbox Naming > > The interpretation of mailbox names is implementation-dependent. > However, the case-insensitive mailbox name INBOX is a special name > reserved to mean "the primary mailbox for this user on this server". > > Is there anywhere else in the RFC this is mentioned? Otherwise it is quite > possible to interprete it as that the primary mailbox SHOULD be called INBOX but It seems pretty clear to me what it means. > if it is called something else (i.e. Mailbox) you cannot use name INBOX for > anything. > Thus Evo would be too rigid in assuming that the primary inbox is called INBOX - > on the other hand, FC shouldn't crash when a client stubbornly looks for the > non-existant INBOX mailbox. evolution will still work if it can't open the imap INBOX, so its not really an issue we need to do anything about. > /Martin S. > Lacking gnupg for this mail. > > -- > Fake mail on the Internet from this address. > Public Key available on request > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
