Hi, Further to the problem I reported friday, I skimmed the IMAP RFC and found
5.1. Mailbox Naming The interpretation of mailbox names is implementation-dependent. However, the case-insensitive mailbox name INBOX is a special name reserved to mean "the primary mailbox for this user on this server". Is there anywhere else in the RFC this is mentioned? Otherwise it is quite possible to interprete it as that the primary mailbox SHOULD be called INBOX but if it is called something else (i.e. Mailbox) you cannot use name INBOX for anything. Thus Evo would be too rigid in assuming that the primary inbox is called INBOX - on the other hand, FC shouldn't crash when a client stubbornly looks for the non-existant INBOX mailbox. /Martin S. Lacking gnupg for this mail. -- Fake mail on the Internet from this address. Public Key available on request _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
