On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 10:26, proXy wrote: > On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 05:38, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > > how about using the ',' and '.' keys? that's what I use and it is > > absolutely no more typing than with n or p > > and since they are next to each other on the keyboard, with < and > it > > makes it easier to visually "see" which way they are supposed to go. A > > nice visual cue if you will. > > > > I'll agree that I liked n and p also, but give it a rest. > > I don't mind n and p or . and , > As long as there is something for browsing the next unread message, and that > something is well documented. > > In a non-related thread, was the feature to make 'reply to list' use the > correct account ever implemented? > I notice there is an X-Evolution-Source so surely it couldn't be too hard to > make it reply using the correct account?
As I've said before, Reply-To-List does use this header. Check the source code if you don't believe me. Jeff > > --proXy > > -- > http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/ > linux.conf.au Perth 2003 <http://www.linux.conf.au> > > PGP Fingerprint <http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/pgp> > 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
