On Fri, 2002-07-19 at 04:48, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 10:26, proXy wrote: > > > > In a non-related thread, was the feature to make 'reply to list' use the > > correct account ever implemented? > > I notice there is an X-Evolution-Source so surely it couldn't be too hard to > > make it reply using the correct account? > > As I've said before, Reply-To-List does use this header. Check the > source code if you don't believe me.
Ok then, however there may be a bug in it. This email has X-Evolution-Source: pop:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/inbox in it's header. Yet when I press reply-to-list it wants to use [EMAIL PROTECTED] rather then [EMAIL PROTECTED] Could this be related to the fact that [EMAIL PROTECTED] has a reply-to ? --proXy -- http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/ linux.conf.au Perth 2003 <http://www.linux.conf.au> PGP Fingerprint <http://davyd.ucc.asn.au/pgp> 08B0 341A 0B9B 08BB 2118 C060 2EDD BB4F 5191 6CDA
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
