On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 15:03, Ryan P Skadberg wrote: > I think we are at a double-edged sword here. I say that because I > definitely want it the old way, but I can understand why people would > not. The reason I say I would want it the old way is that I have a TON > of account aliases to one account which I grab via an IMAP store. Now, > when I go to reply to a mail in that store, the from is always the one > address instead of figuring out which address the message is ACTUALLY > sent to. But, at the same time, I could see how some people might want > it another way. > > I _HATE_ to say this, but any chance of making it a configuration option > (since you said both sets of code are in there already)?
The old code is no longer in there, it was removed (well, more like re-ordered to get the new effect). Jeff > > Skadz > > On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 13:57, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > > In Evolution 1.0.x, we searched the recipients of a message until we > > found one that matched one of your accounts email addresses and used > > that one by default in the composer. If we failed to find your account, > > we would use the X-Evolution-Source header to figure out which account > > it had been downloaded from. Unfortunately, a lot of people complained > > that they wanted it to use the account it was downloaded from, and so we > > now have the 1.1.x behavior: > > > > If the X-Evolution-Source header exists, we use that to find out which > > account the message was downloaded from, failing that we fall back to > > the searching the recipients. > > > > If you go back to probably even last week or the week before in the > > archives for this list, you'll find numerous messages complaining about > > 1.0.x "find my account from this message" behavior. In fact, every week > > there are lots of complaints. All of them wanted it the way it is now. > > You're actually the first person that wants it the old way :-) > > > > Jeff > > > > On Mon, 2002-07-29 at 08:51, Nigel Metheringham wrote: > > > I've recently switched to the 1.1.x development snapshots, and the > > > process evolution uses to determine the outgoing account/identity used > > > when sending messages has changed. > > > > > > I have one receiving account defined - an IMAP server - and around 5 > > > other accounts with no receive option, and the sending information all > > > the same other than the email address field. Mail from all of those > > > accounts ends up on the same IMAP server (although in different > > > folders). > > > > > > With evolution 1.0.x the appropriate sending account was normally picked > > > when replying to messages, presumably by matching the accounts against > > > information in the To/Cc fields in the messages being replied to. > > > > > > With evolution 1.1.x a new message has the default account applied to > > > it. Any replies or forwards use the account which matches the IMAP > > > server. > > > > > > I can modify messages on delivery to add headers etc if needed, so if > > > there is a header I can tweak to "persuade" evo to pick the right > > > outgoing account that would help. > > > > > > Otherwise can someone give me a clue as to how evo chooses the outgoing > > > identity. > > > > > > Nigel. > > > -- > > > [ Nigel Metheringham [EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > > [ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ] > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > > -- > > Jeffrey Stedfast > > Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > Ryan P Skadberg E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Director of Technology U: http://www.mindstorm.com/ > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > GPG fingerprint = 38A2 FF47 8FE3 B86A 7C68 6ECF 947D 4E9F 5FA9 637C > ----------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > _______________________________________________ > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
