On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 20:16, Jeffrey Stedfast wrote: > For more details, see: > http://www.globecom.net/ietf/draft/draft-bambenek-posting-guidelines-00.html
That's pretty interesting. I didn't know such a document existed. :) I hardly ever post in "summary reply" form as the IETF draft suggests. My habit, developed from my BBS days, is to always quote inline (aka point-by-point reply) even if (such as in this case) I'm only quoting one thing. The reason is to immediately establish context. I don't think, as the IETF doc suggests, this detracts from the emphasis of my reply. What are other people's feelings on this? As for removing the signature from the QRT, I have sent a couple emails where it was relevant to quote the person's signature. Every other time I remove it manually, though. I guess it'd be more convenient to have Evo strip the signature from the QRT, but I have mixed feelings that it may be doing the wrong thing. Jason. -- Jason Tackaberry :: [EMAIL PROTECTED] :: 705-949-2301 x330 Academic Computing Support Specialist Information Technology Services Algoma University College :: www.auc.ca _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
