Wait. Did you say something here? I don't see a response... On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 19:39, John Angelmo wrote: > Fre 2002-10-18 klockan 01.29 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast: > > On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 19:01, John Angelmo wrote: > > > Fre 2002-10-18 klockan 00.51 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast: > > > > On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 18:18, John Angelmo wrote: > > > > > Fre 2002-10-18 klockan 00.18 skrev Jeffrey Stedfast: > > > > > > On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 17:54, John Angelmo wrote: > > > > > > > Hello > > > > > > > > > > > > > > For some strange reason all my replys seems to start on top of the > > > > > > > message and not on the bottom (as the standard is) how can I fix that? > > > > > > > > > > > > eh? > > > > > > > > > > Standard is to put your reply below the quoted text, mozilla fixes this > > > > > without any problem > > > > > > > > but you don't reply at the bottom, you comment within the quoted message > > > > normally. If you are just replying to let them know "ok, sounds great" > > > > no need to reply at the bottom and make the guy/gal scroll to the bottom > > > > of the message to read it. That's pretty annoying, instead you'd want > > > > that comment at the top of the message. > > > > > > You reply below the text since it's easier to follow a thread, simple > > > standard stuff. Yes it's sometimes easier to do that if there are > > > several questions > > > > If there aren't several questions that you need to address, then you > > reply at the TOP. Why make the other user scroll all the way to the > > bottom of the message to read your reply? > > > > I'm sorry to say, but this is not a bug and will therefor remain the way > > it is currently. Also, seeing as how no one else has complained - > > changing the behaviour would cause confusion and possibly anger a much > > larger user base. > > > > If you feel so strongly about only replying at the bottom, then just > > scroll to the bottom or hit the "End" key which will do it for you. > >
Oh. Here it is... all the way at the bottom where I have to *SCROLL* to find it. > > Why not simply have an option in the config like mozilla has? If Evolution was just like Mozilla, what'd be the point of using Evolution? > > Or I can just find the RFC describing it ;) It doesn't exist Jeff -- Jeffrey Stedfast Evolution Hacker - Ximian, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - www.ximian.com _______________________________________________ evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
