By the way, your patch is included in Debian unstable
[liborbit0-0.5.17-5]:


--- orbit-0.5.17.orig/src/IIOP/connection.c
+++ orbit-0.5.17/src/IIOP/connection.c
@@ -459,6 +459,7 @@
     fd_cnx->u.usock.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
     getpeername(GIOP_CONNECTION_GET_FD(fd_cnx),
        (struct sockaddr *)&fd_cnx->u.usock, &n);
+    fd_cnx->u.usock.sun_path[0] = '\0';
     break;

 #ifdef HAVE_IPV6

It may not be the correct fix but at least it solves the immediate
problem.

Cheers,

        MikaL


On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 20:23, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:40:45PM +0100, Joaquim Fellmann wrote:
> > On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 02:13, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote:
> > 
> > > Sorry but _NO_ it's not 2.5, Gnome is broken,
> > > you can read all about it and get a patch on the evolution-hackers list.
> > 
> > Wrong too.
> > It seems to be Orbit assuming a kernel routine to return some value but
> > receiving something else. 
> > Actually it was a kernel bug (that got fixed) on which Orbit was
> > relying.
> > Problem is that Orbit didn't get fixed.
> Maybe you should read the thread on evolution-hackers,and then contact some kernel 
>hackers, Alan, Dave and Al come to mind.
> My patch resets new 2.5 behavior for/in Orbit to 2.4 behavior. But the real problem 
>is within Gnome, so far I only hear from the Gnome/Orbit maintainers it's the Kernel 
>without any proof.  Just saying so is not enough, I know it's kind of hard to find a 
>problem in a few hundred thousand kernel and Gnome/evolution source lines. Been there 
>done that.  And if you take a look at the Gnome 2.X source you might find that it's 
>mood to talk about this any further, if you understand the problem.
> Ronald 
> 
> > 
> > A message on the linux kernel mailing list is refering to a bitkeeper
> > changeset at the origin of the "evolution case". Before this changeset
> > Evolution is dealing right with kernel 2.5 and after this changeset it
> > doesn't work anymore.
> > 
> > 
> > See http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-41/0444.html
> > 
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > 
> > Joaquim Fellmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> 
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

_______________________________________________
evolution maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution

Reply via email to