I must be missing something, but what on earth is this fix supposed to
accomplish? It actually fixes something?
I can see doing something like:
if (getpeername (GIOP_CONNECTION_GET_FD(fd_cnx),
(struct sockaddr *)&fd_cnx->u.usock, &n)) < 0)
fn_cnx->u.usock.sun_path[0] = '\0';
but blindly clobbering the path to the socket on the other end seems
like a bad idea.
Chris
On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 21:43, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 05, 2003 at 10:41:43PM +0200, Mika Liljeberg wrote:
> > By the way, your patch is included in Debian unstable
> > [liborbit0-0.5.17-5]:
> >
> >
> > --- orbit-0.5.17.orig/src/IIOP/connection.c
> > +++ orbit-0.5.17/src/IIOP/connection.c
> > @@ -459,6 +459,7 @@
> > fd_cnx->u.usock.sun_family = AF_UNIX;
> > getpeername(GIOP_CONNECTION_GET_FD(fd_cnx),
> > (struct sockaddr *)&fd_cnx->u.usock, &n);
> > + fd_cnx->u.usock.sun_path[0] = '\0';
> > break;
> >
> > #ifdef HAVE_IPV6
> >
> > It may not be the correct fix but at least it solves the immediate
> > problem.
> It is the only place to fix it without interfering with other programs,
> that's why I did fixed it there.
> Good to see that some distributions prefer a stable system.
> Ronald
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > MikaL
> >
> >
> > On Sun, 2003-01-05 at 20:23, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 06, 2003 at 05:40:45PM +0100, Joaquim Fellmann wrote:
> > > > On Sat, 2003-01-04 at 02:13, Ronald Kuetemeier wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Sorry but _NO_ it's not 2.5, Gnome is broken,
> > > > > you can read all about it and get a patch on the evolution-hackers list.
> > > >
> > > > Wrong too.
> > > > It seems to be Orbit assuming a kernel routine to return some value but
> > > > receiving something else.
> > > > Actually it was a kernel bug (that got fixed) on which Orbit was
> > > > relying.
> > > > Problem is that Orbit didn't get fixed.
> > > Maybe you should read the thread on evolution-hackers,and then contact some
>kernel hackers, Alan, Dave and Al come to mind.
> > > My patch resets new 2.5 behavior for/in Orbit to 2.4 behavior. But the real
>problem is within Gnome, so far I only hear from the Gnome/Orbit maintainers it's the
>Kernel without any proof. Just saying so is not enough, I know it's kind of hard to
>find a problem in a few hundred thousand kernel and Gnome/evolution source lines.
>Been there done that. And if you take a look at the Gnome 2.X source you might find
>that it's mood to talk about this any further, if you understand the problem.
> > > Ronald
> > >
> > > >
> > > > A message on the linux kernel mailing list is refering to a bitkeeper
> > > > changeset at the origin of the "evolution case". Before this changeset
> > > > Evolution is dealing right with kernel 2.5 and after this changeset it
> > > > doesn't work anymore.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > See http://www.cs.helsinki.fi/linux/linux-kernel/2002-41/0444.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Joaquim Fellmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
>
> _______________________________________________
> evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
_______________________________________________
evolution maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/evolution
