On Mon, 2009-05-11 at 15:52 -0500, Steve Wise wrote: > I see the same behavior with RC5 on RH5.2/i386. > > I did some reverting, and it appears this commit is the culprit: > > ------------------ > commit 9e1a4dd600347472829859849168fd3a6f7c597c > Author: Jeff Becker <jeffrey.c.bec...@nasa.gov> > Date: Sun May 10 20:21:12 2009 -0700 > > NFSRDMA: remove dependence of backport ib_core on nfs: fixes Bug 1596 > Signed-off-by: Jeff Becker <jeffrey.c.bec...@nasa.gov> > --------------------
So is this just a regression when trying to use NFSRDMA? If I don't build NFSRDMA, will RC5 still be a problem for me or will the core I/B stack be unaffected? b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ ewg mailing list ewg@lists.openfabrics.org http://lists.openfabrics.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ewg
