so who is going to be brave enough to try it (1 minute interval) on their production server and report back if it turns their server into a smoldering heap of molten metal or not?
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 08:46:44 -0500, Michael B. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm not aware of any reason not to. I generally set it to five minutes on my > systems, 'cuz of the warning that says "if you set the time-out values to > very low values, you may affect the performance of the server." > > But the KB doesn't define "very low values". Is that one minute? Five > seconds? (for CacheTTLUser) > > I just dunno... > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley > [MVP] > Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 1:42 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Read a alternate users message > > Is there any reason not to set that registry setting to 1 (minute)? It never > seems to cause any significant negative effect in Exchange 5.5. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP > Freelance E-Mail Philosopher > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!(tm) [snip] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/ To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at: Jupitermedia Corp. Attn: Discussion List Management 475 Park Avenue South New York, NY 10016 Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.
