Thanks! 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed
Crowley [MVP]
Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2005 11:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Self vs. Declared user Mailbox Rights

I just researched this myself recently.  From my understanding SELF is
not required in Mailbox Rights except when the user account to which the
mailbox is attached is disabled, in which case it should have both Full
Mailbox Access and Associated External Account.  This rule also applies
when the "real" owning account is in another forest and the user account
is disabled.
Otherwise you can use SELF but there's nothing to panic about if it's
not there.  So I don't think you have anything to worry about.

Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of User,
IS
(PHES)
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2005 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Self vs. Declared user Mailbox Rights

We converted all of our users from 5.5 to 2000 about 1.5 years ago using
ADC and the MS Migration tools.

Each of the old mailboxes (converted from 5.5) has 2 rights entries
declared for the username (I'm assuming these were one each for the old
NT domain and the converted AD user), but no "Self" user.

All new mailboxes have the standard "Self" account declared.

First question, does it make any difference to overall account health to
use "Self" instead of the declared name (I'm aware of the disabling
mailbox issues of not having self with associated ext... Issue).

Second, if it should be converted to the "Self" account is there a
program or script anyone is aware of that can run against AD to make the
necessary changes programmatically instead of manually updating 500 +
mailboxes that are still in the old format security wise?
 
________________________________

Bob Reasoner
Harris County Public Health & Environmental Services


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange
To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange
To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.




_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/read/?forum=exchange
To subscribe: http://e-newsletters.internet.com/discussionlists.html/
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe via postal mail, please contact us at:
Jupitermedia Corp.
Attn: Discussion List Management
475 Park Avenue South
New York, NY 10016

Please include the email address which you have been contacted with.

Reply via email to