felt a little PUNish coming on and had to get it out Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 15:06:15 -0400 Subject: Re: [Exchange] Any word on Exchange 2013 sp1 issues? From: [email protected] To: [email protected]
Y? Y did you go there? On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:40 PM, Steven Peck <[email protected]> wrote: CU are behind on the terms. Why RU confused about the change? I know I get it wrong all the time myself ;) > Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 11:02:02 -0700 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Exchange] Any word on Exchange 2013 sp1 issues? > > CU update rollup...whatever the dang thing they are calling for the next > release :-) > On 3/20/2014 10:41 AM, Michael B. Smith wrote: > > No. It will be in the next CU. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] > > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Susan Bradley > > Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2014 1:37 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [Exchange] Any word on Exchange 2013 sp1 issues? > > > > There's a KB script to fix it. Final fix will be in the next update rollup. > > > > On 3/20/2014 10:32 AM, Steven Peck wrote: > >> I haven't seen any change on the Exchange blog for the AV/transport > >> issues reported. Anyone else seen any updates? My manager is pushing > >> hard to move towards it in our preproduction environment. > >> > >> Steven Peck > >> > > -- > > Got your CryptoLocker prevention in place? > > http://www.thirdtier.net/2013/10/cryptolocker-prevention-kit-updates/ > > Only one more patching days of XP.... are you ready? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > Got your CryptoLocker prevention in place? > http://www.thirdtier.net/2013/10/cryptolocker-prevention-kit-updates/ > Only one more patching days of XP.... are you ready? > > >
