why can’t that be right?  There are some bigwigs in companies that won’t let 
their email admins block any file attachments because Email is far easier to 
use than FTP.  I just spent most of the Easter weekend helping out a friend 
cleaning up a virus outbreak in a Fortune 1000 company.  After many hours it 
was traced back to an infected exe file received by a user in his email.  This 
company also lets its users send and receive 500 meg attachments because it is 
convenient for the users to do their job.



From: Richard Stovall 
Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:01 PM
To: [email protected] 
Subject: Re: [Exchange] RE: Antivirus placement - Exchange 2010

You can't block *ANY* attachments? 

That can't be right.



On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:

  Your results are more the outcome of your settings to block certain
  attachments than to the Barracuda's prowess in AV detection.

  I am not allowed to block attachments, we have a 410, and I regularly
  see infectious emails come through.

  Whenever I get an unexpected email with an attachment, I submit the
  attachment to 
http://www.threattracksecurity.com/resources/sandbox-malware-analysis.aspx
  and to https://malwr.com/ and regularly see results that make me
  shudder...

  Those submissions are in parallel to my submission to virustotal, and
  invariably the attachment has already been scanned, and nobody has a
  signature for it.

  Mostly, I get these from China (or at least the emails use Chinese
  character sets.)


  Kurt


  On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Kennedy, Jim
  <[email protected]> wrote:
  >
  > "Email AV gateway appliance (vm or physical) (Trend, Barracuda, etc.)"
  >
  > Specifically a Cuda. Only one email virus in a decade of using them. I block
  > exe's, password protected zips and the usual suspect file types with it,
  > that certainly helps.
  >
  >
  > ________________________________
  > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on
  > behalf of Stringham, Steven [[email protected]]
  > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:53 PM
  > To: [email protected]
  > Subject: [Exchange] Antivirus placement - Exchange 2010
  >
  > Antivirus software and Exchange 2010 – where should  I put it? I am looking
  > at this as a performance, security balancing act.  So, my thoughts are where
  > do you folks put it.  A little poll please…
  >
  >
  >
  > ____ AntiSpam outside service – before my internal systems see it.
  >
  >
  >
  > ____ Email AV gateway appliance (vm or physical) (Trend, Barracuda, etc.)
  >
  >
  >
  > ____ Edge Gateway role servers
  >
  >
  >
  > ____ Hub Transport servers
  >
  >
  >
  > ____ Mailbox servers
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > Personally, I think this is a bit of an all of the above type thing, but,
  > where would you put AV for Email.
  >
  >
  >
  > And, do you use separate brands for different spots?
  >
  >
  >
  > Thanks
  >
  > Steven Stringham
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  >
  > ________________________________
  >
  > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
  > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
  > message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
  > agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
  > recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
  > copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
  > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
  > replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
  > attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
  > confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
  > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
  >
  > In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you that
  > if this message or any attachments contains any tax advice, such tax advice
  > was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any
  > taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the
  > taxpayer.




Reply via email to