+ one more.

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Stringham, Steven <[email protected]>wrote:

>  +1
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *David Lum
> *Sent:* Friday, April 25, 2014 12:36 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: [Exchange] RE: Antivirus placement - Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> For this large file send…use something like this:
>
> http://www.liquidfiles.net/
>
>
>
> It’s essentially “FTP via email hyperlink”. It prevents the big crap from
> going through your email servers. I use this and it’s great!
>
>
>
> -Dave Lum
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *Mike Tavares
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:10 PM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] RE: Antivirus placement - Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> why can’t that be right?  There are some bigwigs in companies that won’t
> let their email admins block any file attachments because Email is far
> easier to use than FTP.  I just spent most of the Easter weekend helping
> out a friend cleaning up a virus outbreak in a Fortune 1000 company.  After
> many hours it was traced back to an infected exe file received by a user in
> his email.  This company also lets its users send and receive 500 meg
> attachments because it is convenient for the users to do their job.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Richard Stovall <[email protected]>
>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, April 22, 2014 8:01 PM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] RE: Antivirus placement - Exchange 2010
>
>
>
> You can't block *ANY* attachments?
>
>
>
> That can't be right.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 7:25 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Your results are more the outcome of your settings to block certain
> attachments than to the Barracuda's prowess in AV detection.
>
> I am not allowed to block attachments, we have a 410, and I regularly
> see infectious emails come through.
>
> Whenever I get an unexpected email with an attachment, I submit the
> attachment to
> http://www.threattracksecurity.com/resources/sandbox-malware-analysis.aspx
> and to https://malwr.com/ and regularly see results that make me
> shudder...
>
> Those submissions are in parallel to my submission to virustotal, and
> invariably the attachment has already been scanned, and nobody has a
> signature for it.
>
> Mostly, I get these from China (or at least the emails use Chinese
> character sets.)
>
>
> Kurt
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Kennedy, Jim
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > "Email AV gateway appliance (vm or physical) (Trend, Barracuda, etc.)"
> >
> > Specifically a Cuda. Only one email virus in a decade of using them. I
> block
> > exe's, password protected zips and the usual suspect file types with it,
> > that certainly helps.
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: [email protected] [[email protected]] on
> > behalf of Stringham, Steven [[email protected]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2014 5:53 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [Exchange] Antivirus placement - Exchange 2010
> >
> > Antivirus software and Exchange 2010 – where should  I put it? I am
> looking
> > at this as a performance, security balancing act.  So, my thoughts are
> where
> > do you folks put it.  A little poll please…
> >
> >
> >
> > ____ AntiSpam outside service – before my internal systems see it.
> >
> >
> >
> > ____ Email AV gateway appliance (vm or physical) (Trend, Barracuda, etc.)
> >
> >
> >
> > ____ Edge Gateway role servers
> >
> >
> >
> > ____ Hub Transport servers
> >
> >
> >
> > ____ Mailbox servers
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Personally, I think this is a bit of an all of the above type thing, but,
> > where would you put AV for Email.
> >
> >
> >
> > And, do you use separate brands for different spots?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Steven Stringham
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ________________________________
> >
> > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> > individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> > message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> > agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the
> intended
> > recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> > copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> > have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately
> by
> > replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and
> any
> > attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> > confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> > Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
> >
> > In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you
> that
> > if this message or any attachments contains any tax advice, such tax
> advice
> > was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by any
> > taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on the
> > taxpayer.
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If the reader of this
> message or an attachment is not the intended recipient or the employee or
> agent responsible for delivering the message or attachment to the intended
> recipient you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this message or any attachment is strictly prohibited. If you
> have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by
> replying to the sender. The information transmitted in this message and any
> attachments may be privileged, is intended only for the personal and
> confidential use of the intended recipients, and is covered by the
> Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. §2510-2521.
>
> In accordance with Internal Revenue Service Circular 230, we advise you
> that if this message or any attachments contains any tax advice, such tax
> advice was not intended or written to be used, and it cannot be used, by
> any taxpayer for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed on
> the taxpayer.
>

Reply via email to