SolarWinds Web Help Desk, http://www.solarwinds.com/help-desk-software.aspx

   There's also Spiceworks help desk software. 
http://www.spiceworks.com/free-help-desk-software/


Steve Cain
Sr. System Administrator

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
Behalf Of Kurt Buff
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 1:58 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Exchange] Autoresponder for Customer Service

Solar Winds?

I'll take a look at that.

Kurt

On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:44 AM, Damien Solodow <[email protected]> 
wrote:
> Agreed on getting a real ticketing system. J
>
> SolarWinds has a pretty nifty one that speaks well with Exchange and 
> it’s available as a VM appliance so you can minimize maintenance. It’s 
> pretty inexpensive as well.
>
>
>
> DAMIEN SOLODOW
>
> Systems Engineer
>
> 317.447.6033 (office)
>
> 317.447.6014 (fax)
>
> HARRISON COLLEGE
>
>
>
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]]
> On Behalf Of ccollins9
> Sent: Wednesday, November 5, 2014 1:39 PM
> To: exchange
> Subject: Re: [Exchange] Autoresponder for Customer Service
>
>
>
> The best thing you could do, if able, would be to get a ticketing 
> system that "checks" the inbox of a designated account and generate 
> tickets based on email sitting in there, then it will auto-reply to 
> those messages explaining a ticket was created and generate an ID for 
> the user.  Footprints and Track-It are products i've used to do this.  Maybe 
> since the "important"
> folks want you all do make these improvements they would be willing to 
> pony up some dough so you all can take the customer service to the next level.
>
>
>
> But short of that,
>
>
>
>
>
> Here's what I would do:
>
>
>
> 1. Delete the Distribution List--so you can reuse the SMTP address 
> that it has
>
>
>
> 2. Create a new user mailbox using the same SMTP address of the 
> deleted DL
>
>
>
> 3. There is no need to "have it logged in somewhere forever".  You can 
> simply go into https://OWAAddress/ECP, manage another user, then setup 
> an out of office auto-reply with no ending date. This is done from the 
> server side and "outside" of Outlook, so there is no need to have 
> Outlook running, ever. The only down side to this would be that the 
> user would only get the out of office reply once.  Exchange knows when 
> a sender has already received and out of office message from a 
> recipient--this is to prevent the bounce loop.
>
>
>
> 4. Then I would decide exactly how I want email flow to work.  For 
> example, If I want any messages sent to this new address to also get 
> sent to all my technicians I would do this:
>
>
>
> Create a new DL containing all the technicians.  Go into the EMC  and 
> bring up the account properties of the new mailbox created in step 2, 
> under "Delivery Options" enable forwarding, then check the option to 
> "deliver message to both forwarding address and mailbox".  Checking 
> this will ensure that the message is both forwarded to your 
> technician's DL address AND the out of office reply is generated and sent.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 12:29 PM, Kurt Buff <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> All,
>
> We currently have a DL for customer service/technical support, and 
> some (important) folks would like to set up an autoresponder for the 
> address.
>
> We are running Exchange 2010, and transitioning from Outlook 2010 to 2013.
>
> I've pointed out that you can't put up an autoresponder on a DL, and 
> that there are basically three options (AFAICT - please correct me if 
> I'm wrong!):
>
> o- Move the SMTP address to a mailbox with a rule and have it logged 
> in somewhere forever
>
> o- Move the SMTP address to a PF and set an autoresponder on it
>
> o- Use a third-party product.
>
> I've pointed out the risk of a bounce war, and they don't seem to care...
>
> Also, AFAICS, a transport rule will only generate a bounce message 
> that looks weird and has only limited characters.
>
> Can you folks recommend a (fairly cheap) third party autoresponder for 
> this kind of thing?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Kurt
>
>


Reply via email to