Tapes work fine with Veeam, just make sure you have a good tape vault with
a good Windows driver that can control it. We use a Dell ML6000 series
which believe is a rebranded Adic Scaler. Backup Exec I think used it's own
driver with the ML and it always had problems. We also backup to Dell
direct attached storage
On Nov 10, 2014 10:37 PM, "Freddy Grande" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>  What problem did you have with tapes?
>
> We currently use DPM to backup to disk then tapes but I've planned to move
> over to just Veeam B&R and it has tape support that has fared well in my
> testing.
>
>
>
> Freddy
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Alice Goodman
> *Sent:* Tuesday, 11 November 2014 1:26 PM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* RE: [Exchange] RE: Veeam
>
>
>
> What are you backing up to?  We still use Tapes and Veeam could not attach
> to the physical tape drives.  So we are still on BE and looking for
> something to replace it with. Commvault is too expensive, and not sure
> where else to look.
>
>
>
> Alice
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *ccollins9
> *Sent:* Sunday, November 09, 2014 5:31 PM
> *To:* exchange
> *Subject:* Re: [Exchange] RE: Veeam
>
>
>
> Yes, it's out and we have already upgraded. It's nice!  We are lucky to
> have very few physical servers left, and the ones that are essentially for
> their data replicated to the VM world and we back it up there.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 2:41 PM, Steve Ens <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Is 8 already out?  I haven't seen that update yet.  Need to go find it.  I
> still run BE for a few physical machines since Veeam is only virtual.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 1:35 PM, ccollins9 <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> We replaced Backup Exec with Veeam a few years ago and love it. Haven't
> regretted it one bit and we especially like the direct SAN integration.
> Restores for AD and SQL were really funky where you needed to bring up a
> "virtual lab", but they changed and improved that in version 8 that was
> just released. Works great for exchange. There was one annoyance with
> exchange that I can't remember right now, I'll try to remember and reply
> again
>
> On Nov 7, 2014 1:18 PM, "Steve Ens" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>  I find that you need a beefy server to actually run the software
> properly, but on the host machines (Hyper V for me) it is great.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2014 at 11:43 AM, Senter, John <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>  We are planning on looking at this as well.  What have been your
> experiences with the product?  Any noticeable overhead on the servers?  Are
> the reports beneficial for the cost?
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Jimmy Tran
> *Sent:* Friday, November 7, 2014 10:06 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Exchange] RE: Veeam
>
>
>
> Yes, I do.
>
>
>
> *From:* [email protected] [
> mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>] *On
> Behalf Of *David McSpadden
> *Sent:* Friday, November 07, 2014 6:47 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* [Exchange] Veeam
>
>
>
> Anyone using Veeam with Exchange 2010?
>
>
>
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are property of Indiana
> Members Credit Union, are confidential, and are intended solely for the use
> of the individual or entity to whom this e-mail is addressed. If you are
> not one of the named recipient(s) or otherwise have reason to believe that
> you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and
> delete this message immediately from your computer. Any other use,
> retention, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this email is
> strictly prohibited.
>
>
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
> NOTICE: This email is confidential. If you are not the nominated
> recipient, please immediately delete this email, destroy all copies and
> inform the sender. Australian Maritime Systems Ltd (AMS) prohibits the
> unauthorised copying or distribution of this email. This email does not
> necessarily express the views of AMS. AMS does not warrant nor guarantee
> that this email communication is free from errors, virus, interception or
> interference.
>

Reply via email to