So the answer is:  *insert drumroll here*
D.  None of the above.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 1:07 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration.
> 
> 
> If the log drive fails, all transactions are committed to the 
> database and
> Exchange shuts down.  (That is in theory.)  However, your 
> point is quite
> valid since the log drive is also the OS drive, and if the OS 
> drive fails, I
> don't trust anything to shut down right.  So I would agree to 
> mirror the
> OS-Log drive and put the database on the unmirrored third 
> drive.  I would
> also partition the OS-Log drive into two partitions (9 + 9 GB 
> sounds fine,
> adjusting that one way or the other is fine, too) so that if 
> you have some
> problem with backups and the logs don't get purged for a 
> period of time it
> doesn't completely kill your system.
> 
> Still, I'd want one more drive before I'd call this a 
> production server,
> even if for only ten months.
> 
> Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
> Tech Consultant
> Compaq Computer Corporation
> All your base are belong to us.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Osborn, Joel
> Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 5:38 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration.
> 
> 
> You would put the logs on an unmirrored drive?
> 
> Data (that has been backed up) can be recovered. Unbacked up 
> logs (created
> since the last back up) cannot.
> 
> I'm not sure what the answer would be, given the drive 
> constraints, but I
> would press for some more drive. I would not trust the logs to a
> non-redundant spindle. But I also understand the need to keep 
> the logs and
> data on seperate spindles.
> 
> Joel K. Osborn
> Information Systems Technical Specialist
> Wisconsin Department of Transportation
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:17 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration.
> 
> 
> Yes.  In fact, you could have just a C drive.
> 
> Now, if you want to have SOME chance of recovery if the 
> server crashes, I
> would do the following:
> 
> 1) Format the hard drives
> 2) Break the RAID 5
> 3) Take one disk and format it as C:
> 4) Take the other two disks, and mirror them to create D:
> 5) Install the OS and Exchange on C:
> 6) Tell performance optimiser to put the Logs on C: and the 
> Information
> Store on D:.
> 
> Then, ghod forbid you lose a spindle, you can still recover.
> 
> Drew (MOS)
> ********************************
> KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
> Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM:
> http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp
> Pics of Max are BACK!  http://www.drewncapris.net
> ********************************
> "...Slide show...  ...BORING...  <thunk   Zzzz..." - The Tick
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 8:03 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration.
> 
> 
> Hi, Drewski
> I am going to use this server for 10 month only, then I would 
> upgrade the
> server to Exchange 2000 server.
> If I am running RAID 5 on all my three drives, are you saying 
> I could just
> have C and D drive instead of having C, D, E, and F drives? 
> It won't matter
> at all.
> 
> Thanks
> John Shi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Drewski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 6:03 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration.
> 
> 
> With the set up you have, it really doesn't matter, because 
> your partitions
> are either sharing physical drives, or spanning physical 
> drives -- so if a
> drive fails, you'll lose everything anyway.
> 
> Drew (MOS)
> ********************************
> KWAR2001 website: www.schoolofdefence.org/kwar.html
> Read my Column on OUTLOOKEXCHANGE.COM:
> http://www.outlookexchange.com/articles/drewnicholson/default.asp
> Pics of Max are BACK!  http://www.drewncapris.net
> ********************************
> "Not only does the English Language borrow words from other 
> languages, it
> sometimes chases them down dark alleys, hits them over the 
> head, and goes
> through their pockets." - Eddy Peters
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Shi
> Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 7:53 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: A good space for the Exchange server 5.5 configuration.
> 
> 
> Hi, Everyone
> 
> I have a server that has 3*18.2 GB. I have 4 GB on the C drive.
> 
> I have installed a Windows 2000 server and SP2 on the C 
> drive. I need to
> install Exchange server 5.5 on that.
> 
> I would like to find out what is the best space usage for private
> Information store, Public Information store, Information Store Logs,
> Directory Service, Directory Service logs, and MTA.
> 
> Should I just have C and D drive or I should have C, D, E, F 
> drive? How do
> I allocate these spaces?
> 
> The following is what I see from the MS book..
> 
> Private Information store C:\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA
> Public Information Store C:\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA
> Inforamtion Store Logs D:\Exchsrvr\MDBDATA
> Directory Service F:\exchsrvr\DSADATA
> Message Transfer Agent E:\exchsrvr\mtadata
> 
> 
> I do not know how to allocate the disk space on each drive.
> 
> Thanks
> John Shi
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to