Sounds like a good reason to use an ESE based AV solution instead. Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-----Original Message----- From: Stephen Mynhier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2001 7:54 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Exchange-aware virus scanners VAPI scanners, but not MAPI scanners, will interfere with the OST synchronization. But MAPI AV has some notable downsides. Or you can scan it before it hits the mailbox. Check out both Q269439 and Q264731 concerning tasks failing with a VAPI scanner. The two articles seem to point towards changing the values in 2 dif't directions (changing OpenRetryDelay to 250 or 5000 where the default is 500). Also check out Q263949 to give you a more thorough overview of VAPI and attachments. Stephen -----Original Message----- From: Loftus Greig To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 10/2/01 7:02 AM Subject: Exchange-aware virus scanners Exchange 5.5 SP4, NT4 Sp6a Is there any Exchange 5.5 AV product that doesn't interfere with archiving and synchronizing (mailbox->PST operations, basically). After following the MSKB advice re. registry settings for tackling this, we're still having problems. FWIW, the problem persists after moving exchange to a new, more powerful system. TIA. Loftus Greig. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
