Arcserve works. Period. So does Veritas but the final choice is very
personal. Different folks like different things and all will give you the
benefit of their experience on any given product Either way, disaster
recovery should be at least tested in a lab rather than when the disaster
happens. Better to ride a familiar horse in any race than one which is
unproven.
Personally, I use Legato and for no other reason than I know it and I know
it well. It can be cumbersome, true but so can anything. Depends on what you
find comfortable.
Legato will get me home every time as I'm sure Arcserve would if I had the
time to get to know it. I guess what I'm saying is that all the products
mentioned are heavyweights in the backup market but your own preference is
going to be the final decision maker....  :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Govindaraj Rangan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 18 October 2001 13:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups


Bcoz I'm successfully riding on that horse for last 4 years without even a
single problem! I would like my horse take me home, not to win a race... ;-)

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Randal, Phil
Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 6:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups


Do you always bet on the losing horse?

---------------------------------------------
Phil Randal
Network Engineer
Herefordshire Council
Hereford, UK

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Govindaraj Rangan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: 18 October 2001 13:39
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Opinion on Backups
>
>
> I would bet on ArcServe.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Craig Manske
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2001 2:15 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Opinion on Backups
>
>
> I've been looking at Backup software for out NT/2000/Exchange servers.
> Right now we run Veritas Backup Exec but because of the poor
> support (Pay
> support sucks) and horriable Customer Service (They didn't have any
> information on file about my company or purchases).  I've
> decided to choose
> another brand of tape software.  What I'd like to know is what you're
> opinion is on the best software (Other then BE) to use with NT/2000
> including Exchange support.
>
> Thanks
> --
> Craig Manske <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> IS Manager
> Stanek Tool <www.stanektool.com>
> New Berlin, WI
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to