The x.400 scanner listed at mail-resources.com works basically that way as a relay x.400 box. Do you currently have an issue with viruses passing between the two systems which is large enough to justify the expense? Will the scan package you use in the relay scenario described in your post be from a different vendor than the ones you are using on Notes and Exchange currently? If not, it seems like a waste of time.
Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage! > -----Original Message----- > From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 4:20 AM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Stupid thinking? > > > Dear anyone, > > We have a Lotus Notes environment connected to our Exchange > environment. The messaging bridgehead server (Exchange 5.5) > is connected to the Exchange/Notes gateway server with an > X400 Connector. The Exchange/Notes gateway (Exchange 5.5) is > connected to the Notes environment with a Connector for Lotus > Notes. We have an anti-virus software package installed on > the Lotus Notes server the Connector for Lotus Notes is > connected to. We want to implement some sort of second > security layer between Exchange and Notes. Keeping in mind > that there is still no anti-virus scanner for an X400 > Connector on Exchange 5.5, is it possible to put an extra box > between the messaging bridgehead and the Exchange/Notes > gateway, connect the messaging bridgehead to the extra box > with an X400 Connector, connect the extra box to the > Exchange/Notes gateway with an IMS and install a virus > scanner that can scan the IMS on the extra box to form this > second security layer or is this stupid thinking? Any help > would be appreciated. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
