Nah. Why spend that much when they can spend what they do now (NOTHING) and us QMail? (Which is what they use)
THe Oracle product only makes sense if you can piggyback the installation on top of an existing database server. Roger ------------------------------------------------------ Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT Senior Systems Administrator Peregrine Systems Atlanta, GA http://www.peregrine.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 1:12 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not! > > > On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Mike Carlson wrote: > > I was reading about the Email package Oracle offers and it > really doesnt > > look like much more than a standard POP3/IMAP server that has a "new > > feature" called web calendaring. > > I suppose this Oracle thing might appeal to someone like > Earthlink, with > 8 kabillion mailboxes that simply get POP'ed out constantly. > That is a > mighty niche market though, and not one Exchange is targeted > at anyway. > > -- > Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the > author and do not | > | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other > person, entity or | > | organization. All information is provided without warranty > of any kind. | > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
