I was reading about the Email package Oracle offers and it really doesnt
look like much more than a standard POP3/IMAP server that has a "new
feature" called web calendaring.
 
Hmmmm........ sounds allot like IMail by Ipswitch. Just 200 times the
cost.
 
It doesnt look like it does hardly any collaboration at all besides the
big bad Web Calendaring.
 
Mike

        -----Original Message----- 
        From: Dupler, Craig 
        Sent: Tue 11/13/2001 11:51 AM 
        To: Exchange Discussions 
        Cc: 
        Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
        
        

        Interesting discussion.
        
        A couple of observations:  Exchange and Notes are about
something quite
        different than Oracle and other similar messaging engines.  What
Ellison
        calls e-mail, is not the same thing.  The reasons that the
mostly Unix based
        systems did not get the market that went the LAN server based
systems was
        the cost of entry for small installations, and the lack of
critical features
        such as integration with the Windows desktop and a good group
calendaring
        solution.
        
        That much being said, Exchange and Notes are now incumbents.  If
they fail
        to do the better job of supporting emerging requirements from
other
        platforms, then Exchange and Notes could also go away or become
        marginalized.  Right now, Exchange does not do the web as well
as it should,
        and some parts of Microsoft still labor under the totally lame
notion that
        the new small devices are only companions to big PC's.  Unix
folks back in
        the 80's used to look down their noses at the lowly PC and could
not bring
        themselves to stoop to be good service providers to them.  Much
of that same
        attitude is now being exhibited by the PC systems communities
toward the new
        smaller devices.  What goes around . . .
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
        Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:23 AM
        To: Exchange Discussions
        Subject: RE: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
        
        
        "Ellison derided Microsoft's Exchange e-mail servers as
unreliable and
        insecure."
        Huh? What??
        
        -----Original Message-----
        From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug
Hampshire
        Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:17 AM
        To: Exchange Discussions
        Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
        
        
        
        
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/20011113/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
        _e-m
        ail_crown_1.html
        
        
        
_________________________________________________________________
        List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
        Archives:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
        To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
        
        
_________________________________________________________________
        List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
        Archives:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
        To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        
        
_________________________________________________________________
        List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
        Archives:
http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
        To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
        Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        

��h�ا�P��i��0��"��(��޲��q����_j�m�
܆+޲m����0�y�o�׬y�܇�j�!j�S��칻�&ޙ����^j����Z����2�G(�L\���x����f�yb�֝�)��)�r�


Reply via email to