I didn't think you could change the container of an object once it was
created.  I know you could change the Home Server on a PF, but the
container?  Can anyone verify this one way or the other?

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> ----------
> From:         Roger Seielstad
> Reply To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:         Monday, November 19, 2001 13:41
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      RE: Public Folder Replication
> 
> I don't believe it can be done.
> 
> Actually, in retrospect, it could be done, but it would be ugly. Very
> ugly.
> 
> By default, Public Folders officially live in the default Recipients
> container, but there is an option to change that (can't remember where,
> but
> its there). Theoretically, you could make all public folders in an
> alternate
> container, and then build a second connector (limited using either
> Connected
> Sites or Address Space - you'd have to play with it in a lab to be sure)
> to
> handle the traffic.
> 
> As I said - ugly, very ugly.
> 
> It really sounds like you either need bigger pipes or to limit the message
> size to improve your delivery times.
> 
> Alternately, remove the remote replica and let the remote users come
> across
> the WAN only when they need access to the file.
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
> Senior Systems Administrator
> Peregrine Systems
> Atlanta, GA
> http://www.peregrine.com
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fred [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Monday, November 19, 2001 8:47 AM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: Public Folder Replication
> > 
> > 
> > Greetings,
> > I was wondering if anyone might have a suggestion on a 
> > reoccurring issue I
> > have.  My users use an application that publishes documents to public
> > folders, occasionally they send large documents to these folders. 
> > Limiting the size has been ruled out, but the problem is..  when they
> > publish large messages, they have to replicate across country 
> > through our
> > IMC, which causes a severe backup, 30minutes to an hour.  All 
> > messages are
> > sent high priority, and is actually extremely important for 
> > our business,
> > so changing replication schedules is not an option.  Has 
> > anyone dealt with
> > this before? is there way I can change the routing of Public folder
> > traffic so it won't interfere with production?  Thanks in advance,
> > Fred
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to