Mounting the first mailbox store in a storage group takes more resources
that mounting additional stores in a single storage group. So, from a pure
resources point of view, there may be some advantages to multiple stores in
fewer storage groups. All other things being equal, I think I generally
prefer it that way as well, although I personally don't have enough
practical experience with disaster recovery under a multitude of scenarios
with E2K (thank $deity), so there are some parts of the 'optimal' E2K design
which are still a bit theoretical in my mind.

Chris
-- 
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage! 


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Duane Purcell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 6:26 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores
> 
> 
> Basically we want to move away from the large single IS 
> database and have several smaller ones which are more 
> managable (in event of disaster recovery, backup/restore, 
> offline maintanence, applying different mailbox limits, etc). 
>  Also, assuming there is only a problem with one IS, we don't 
> this problem affecting all other users.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Wednesday, 28 November 2001 10:39 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores
> 
> 
> It's best to not let external hierarchies dictate how 
> technological solutions are developed.
> 
> What is the point of this exercise? What do you hope to gain? 
> Is there a desired end result towards which you are working? 
> What are the perceived business benefits?
> 
> Answer those first.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Duane Purcell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 5:26 PM
> Subject: Storage Groups vs Mailbox Stores
> 
> 
> I want to split up my staff mailboxes into relevant units eg, 
> payroll, managers, etc, on my E2k Enterprise server.  Is it 
> best to create mutiple Mailbox Stores under one Storage 
> Group, OR, just have several Storage Groups with the single 
> Mailbox Store.
> 
> Is there any advantage going one way or the other?

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to