Thanks Peter, that's a good balanced opinion. I'm not so much just looking
for an argument against html (although anything which keeps message sizes
smaller has got to be better for everyone) just making sure that html will
have a future if we adopt it more widely. I'd missed the thought about
virus scanners scanning message bodies for rogue code. So many html
messages when you read them these days seem to go out to the internet to
pick up the rest of the message that I was starting to get concerned about
what else they may do whilst they're pulling data down.

Cheers

Andy Russell
Exchange Admininstrator
MCSE

> I don't think that converting all your outgoing messages to HTML will increase the 
>chances of a virus outbreak. I'm guessing that 95% of the messages we send are HTML 
>as it is, since all the rich text messages are converted to HTML on sending to the 
>Internet. Furthermore, because of Kak, all the virus scanners now are capable of 
>scanning message bodies for viruses encoded in the HTML.
> 
> If you're looking for an argument against HTML message branding, I think a better 
>one will be all the email clients still out there that probably won't be able to view 
>them correctly.
> 
> -Peter
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 1:16
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails
> 
> 
> Peter
> 
> Thanks for your reply. re. branding emails - this is a 3rd party add on to
> the internet mail connector that converts the email into html and adds
> your logo to the top of it and also adds a sidebar giving address/contact
> details. It ends up looking like a framed web page. It is viruses
> travelling in html formatting I'm particularly interested in so I'll check
> the kak worm out in more detail. I think it's only a matter of time before
> a major virus outbreak occurs caused by mass mailing of an html newsletter
> fetching something from the web when it's viewed. It's everyone's worst
> fear having a virus where the user only has to open a message to activate
> it rather than having to open an attachment. Let me know what you think.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Andy 
> 
> > There have been several viruses that have tried to update themselves from internet 
>addresses, both websites and newsgroups. There have also been a few that have 
>travelled in the HTML formatting of e-mails, notably the kak worm. I don't think 
>there have been any that did both, however.
> > 
> > What do you mean by branding emails with html conversions?
> > 
> > -Peter
> > 
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Russell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 13:32
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: partially off-topic - virus' travelling via html e-mails
> > 
> > 
> > Hi all
> > 
> > I am trying to find if there is any evidence of virus' travelling via html
> > format emails between systems - ie. the sort of virus that goes and
> > fetches something off of the internet when you view the html email. There
> > is movement in my company to start branding emails with html conversions
> > but I think that with the increasing quantity of virus' around html email
> > will be unpopular within a year or so and everyone will go back to rich
> > text or plain text. Of course I could be wrong.... anyone seen any
> > articles about this type of risk? I'm not talking about the direct
> > replication of the virus in this format - more the initial infection
> > coming in this way rather than as an attachment which is getting rather
> > predictable now...
> > 
> > Many thanks
> > 
> > Andy Russell
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > ______________________________________________
> > This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
> > person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
> > and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
> > this message to anyone else.
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> ______________________________________________
> This message is private or privileged.  If you are not the
> person for whom this message is intended, please delete it
> and notify me immediately, and please do not copy or send
> this message to anyone else.

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to