When internet e-mail is converted, isn't it written to the store? Chris -- Chris Scharff Senior Sales Engineer MessageOne If you can't measure, you can't manage!
> -----Original Message----- > From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:07 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: TrendMicro ESE vs. AVAPI > > > ScanMail on the Exchange server. ScanMail only scans messages > destined for the DS/IS. Messages passing through your IMS > will not get scanned by ScanMail. You don't need to load > ScanMail on the IMS only server if it doesn't have any > mailboxes. Use InterScan for the Gateway. > > -- > Matthew > Exchange Disaster Recovery, Live it, Learn It, Love It, Get > yours today! > http://www.microsoft.com/TechNet/exchange/technote/edrv3p1.asp > > "Besides the technical limitations on the PST (remember the P > stands for Personal, that means you're responsible not the > mail admin)..." Jim Schwartz 8-16-01 > > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Edwards, Aaron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 3:56 PM > >>>To: Exchange Discussions > >>>Subject: RE: TrendMicro ESE vs. AVAPI > >>> > >>> > >>>While on the subject of Scanmail... We have an Exchange > >>>server that has about 600 mailboxes. We have separate > >>>servers for IMS and OWA. IMS and OWA sit on their own > >>>separate DMZs. We are thinking of implementing Scanmail this > >>>weekend as well. Right now we're running NAV for Exchange. > >>>Can I install Scanmail on IMS only for right now to act as a > >>>kind of virus blocking gateway? Or do I have to use > >>>Interscan Viruswall for that? Should I put them on our main > >>>Exchange server and IMS or just on one? > >>> > >>>Thanx for your help > >>> > >>>Aaron > >>> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 11:47 AM > >>>To: Exchange Discussions > >>>Subject: RE: TrendMicro ESE vs. AVAPI > >>> > >>> > >>>Actually Trend introduced ESE based scanning with version > >>>3.6. So, this would be the revision to that. We have a > >>>fairly large deployment of ScanMail 3.6 running in ESE mode > >>>and didn't have any problems so far. > >>> > >>>S. > >>> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 2:17 PM > >>>To: Exchange Discussions > >>>Subject: RE: TrendMicro ESE vs. AVAPI > >>> > >>> > >>>Well, it's Trend's first foray into the ESE methodology of > >>>scanning, so a little healthy caution is in order IMHO... > >>>But the ESE methodology of scanning bypasses several of the > >>>more annoying limitations of the 1.0 version of the AVAPI > >>>found in Exchange 5.5. You get access to not only the > >>>attachments, but also the message body and sender/recipient > >>>information using the ESE method. I don't believe that > >>>eManager works with 3.72 yet (could be wrong, feel free to > >>>correct me) so the content filtering aspect might not be > >>>attractive at this point, but knowing who the sender and > >>>recipient are of infected messages can be a useful feature. > >>> > >>>Chris > >>>-- > >>>Chris Scharff > >>>Senior Sales Engineer > >>>MessageOne > >>>If you can't measure, you can't manage! > >>> > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > >>>> Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 1:16 PM > >>>> To: Exchange Discussions > >>>> Subject: TrendMicro ESE vs. AVAPI > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Good afternoon to you all: > >>>> > >>>> I am looking for some good reasons (other than trying > >>>> to keep software up to date) as to why I want to load > version 3.7 > >>>> of Trend Micro's AV software for Exchange, rather than keep the > >>>> current ver. 3.52. > >>>> > >>>> Yes, ESE is introduced, but what does that give me, > >>>> when compared to the MAPI/AVAPI scanning I do now. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks for anything you can give me. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> John Matteson; Exchange Manager > >>>> Geac Corporate Infrastructure Systems and Standards > >>>> (404) 239 - 2981 > >>>> > >>>> Do the voices in my head bother you? > >>>> > >>>> _________________________________________________________________ > >>>> List posting FAQ: > http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >>>> Archives: > http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > >>>> To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> > >>> > >>>_________________________________________________________________ > >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>> > >>>_________________________________________________________________ > >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > >>>_________________________________________________________________ > >>>List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > >>>Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > >>>To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>> > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
