I tried uninstalling the e5.5  IMS (whilst the e5.5 server was still
operational) and letting e2k SMTP services take over...
Unfortunately, the messages just sat in the x.400 queue waiting to go to
the e5.5 server for sending. They didn't seem interested in travelling
via SMTP. I also tried restarting the routing and MTA services on the
e2k server but this had no impact.

Inbound e-mail still comes in... outbound mail for recipients on the e2k
server sits there waiting ...

I ended up having to re-create the e5.5 IMS and as soon as I did that,
the mail started flowing back out....

Any ideas?
Thanks,
MP



-----Original Message-----
From: Barb McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2002 11:50 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k


Then forget about it ... just get rid of your IMS and the E2K SMTP
services
will tak over.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 4:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k


nope. there are no mailboxes on the e5.5 server.

-----Original Message-----
From: Barb McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2002 11:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k


Are there any mailboxes that need to send Internet mail still on the 5.5
server?  

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 4:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k


Also,

if I remove the e5.5 IMC, will e5.5 detect the IMC on the e2k server?
(the e2k connector does not appear in the connectors part of exchange
administrator....

MP

-----Original Message-----
From: Barb McDonald [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 24 January 2002 11:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k


Did you delete the 5.5 IMS?  If not you need to and let the SMTP Servers
in
EX2k take over?  As long as there is a 5.5IMS in the ORG it will be the
preferred route for Internet mail.  Also make sure your Firewall
understands
that the E2K Server(s) are allowed to send/receive SMTP via Port 25.

Look at Q272314 and Q284148 for the detailed procedures for retiring the
5.5
server.

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 3:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Removing last Exchange 5.5 from e2k


Hi,

Although I have followed Q152959.. I still have an issue:
I have 2 e2k SP1 servers (one with a Internet mail connector) and 1 e5.5
SP4 server (second internet mail connector with cost=100).

The Routing Calculation Server is set to be the e2k server with the mail
connector. When I look at the routing tab in the Site Addressing
properties on e5.5 server, the more expensive  SMTP conector is listed
as the SMTP route.

This is affecting inbound / outbound mail for the second e2k server who
still thinks the e5.5 server has the IMC. When I click re-calculate
routing, nothing changes. I don't think the e5.5 server is aware of the
e2k IMC...

Is it just a matter of upgrading the e5.5 server to e2k,  and letting
exchange routing sort itself out?? Then removing the 2nd and more
expensive IMC?

Any comments or suggestions would be appreciated..

Thanks,
MP

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to