Fine. Do the users NT 4.0 accounts have permissions on the E2K mailboxes?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 6:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Stumped big time NT4.0 permissions They login into a NT4.0 domain that has a two way trust setup. Same on the 2000 side. Both verify fine. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:53 PM Subject: RE: Stumped big time NT4.0 permissions > Which account are they logging in with? You can use NT accounts for > authentication if you have a full trust between Active Directory and > the Windows NT domain. Your Windows 2000 account means nothing if > they're logging in with a Windows NT account. > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > Tech Consultant > Compaq Computer Corporation > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 5:16 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Stumped big time NT4.0 permissions > > > Tried that same result. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ed Crowley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 8:01 PM > Subject: RE: Stumped big time NT4.0 permissions > > > > I would prefer to leave my clothes on, if you don't mind. > > > > The key to sharing folders in Exchange Server is that you need to > > grant read permissions on the root mailbox folder (Outlook Today) > > then > > > appropriate permissions or no permissions on the subfolders. > > > > Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I > > Tech Consultant > > Compaq Computer Corporation > > Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups! > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse > > Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 2:52 PM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: Stumped big time NT4.0 permissions > > > > > > This is a repeat I will try once more here before calling PSS > > > > My problem is this. Bare with me while I try to explain in detail. > > > > I installed a new 2000 domain with E2K. Single server fairly simple. > > Imported all of the user info needed from their Eudora server. > > Everthing so far so good. Majority of the user where using POP3 > > clients. Redirected DNS to point to the new server. Everthing fine > > users can get/send mail. Now the fun part. They were using net > > folders > > > on some Outlook clients to share contacts, calendars, etc. . Because > > Netfolders requires RTF messaging to send the updates, they were > > using > > > PST's at the time (eudora) To make things stable and since they now > > have an Exchange server, I converted the calendar sharing clients > > from > > > Internet/PST to Exchange Server services. They login into a NT4.0 > > Domain (which has a full trust setup with the E2K domain) and use > > the Exchange server that resides in their only 2000 domain (mixed > > mode). For the NT4.0 users to see their respective mailboxes, I gave > > those users full mailbox rights to the associated 2000 domain > > account. That worked just fine. They could send/recieve mail. > > > > Finally to the part that does not work. When they go to the > > properties tab say of calendar and give permission to some one else, > > it says unable to open folders when the user(assistant) tries to > > open via open other > > user(s) folder. If I give the user(assistant) read only mailbox > > rights to the sharing user in 2000, same result. If I give the > > assistant full mailbox rights, they can open the folder. But they > > also can open any > of > > the folders and write to them whether they only have reviewer rights > or > > not. > > > > I am thinking that I have to upgrade the other NT 4.0 domains to > > 2000 > > > so the security model is the same. Was thinking of using the child > > domain schema. This has really got me stumped. been trying to > > resolve this for awhile. > > > > I hope its something easy but have a feeling it is not, especially > > because they have 14 other domains that this may apply to for > > sharing calendar info. in the future. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
