While their second argument is technically valid (backups treat whitespace
and used space the same), I would think that you wouldn't have much
whitespace to begin with.

Check the even logs to see just how much whitespace exists. On my 20+GB
databases, it tends to be less than a few megs. I'd ask them to compare the
amount of downtime it would take for a defrag on your store (hours, many
hours) vs. the shorter backup window (which doesn't affect anyone).

------------------------------------------------------
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA


> -----Original Message-----
> From: paragon400 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 1:42 PM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: eseutil /d
> 
> 
> Their reasoning is to save disk space (there really is not a 
> disk space issue...9 GB store on a 40 GB drive for 
> example)...and to speed up backups.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:05 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: Re: eseutil /d
> 
> 
> One cannot prove a negative. Have them give their reasoning 
> for this and then you can address their concerns.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "paragon400" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:32 AM
> Subject: eseutil /d
> 
> 
> > I have some team members here that believe that regular
> > defragmentation
> > (offline) should be done as routine maintenance.  I don't share this
> > opinion, but I am having a hard time finding evidence to support my
> > belief.  Does anyone know of any links that support the theory that
> > eseutil should not be used for regular maintenance or am I wrong and
> > should it be part of regular maintenance?
> >
> > Exchange 5.5 environment.
> >
> > Thanks for any help anyone can provide.
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to