I remember that.

Mr Woodrick was pushing the envelope there.  With the whitespace taken away,
Exchange would have to take back diskspace as the database began to grow
again.  The resources required for that would likely not be noticeable.  :o)

But of course he was correct.

William

-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Zorz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:06 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: eseutil /d


I remember an excellent explanation of how this will actually hurt Exchange
performance by one of the Ed's.  I saved it, then lost it somehow. Maybe
someone still has it.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Couch, Nate
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 10:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: eseutil /d


Try reading Jim McBee's book - Exchange 247.  It talks about this very
issue.  Basically, it comes down to the view, from my reading, that "if it
ain't broke - leave it alone".  If you aren't seeing any errors in the Event
logs that clue you into a problem with the databases don't go begging for
trouble - you are likely to find it.

All the best in your battle with your coworkers.

Nate Couch
EDS Messaging

> ----------
> From:         paragon400
> Reply To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:         Friday, March 15, 2002 11:32
> To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject:      eseutil /d
>
> I have some team members here that believe that regular defragmentation
> (offline) should be done as routine maintenance.  I don't share this
> opinion, but I am having a hard time finding evidence to support my
> belief.  Does anyone know of any links that support the theory that
> eseutil should not be used for regular maintenance or am I wrong and
> should it be part of regular maintenance?
>
> Exchange 5.5 environment.
>
> Thanks for any help anyone can provide.
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.338 / Virus Database: 189 - Release Date: 3/14/2002


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to