auto-neg - work of the devil!!

PBB


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 20 March 2002 16:55
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC


I didn't want him to spend money unnecessarily either. I just wanted him to
have all the information I had.

Anyway, it'll probably be something silly like having auto-negotiation
enabled on the switch. :)

Tom.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 4:08 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC

Thomas, I was not doubting that your response was factually correct, it is.
I'm just trying to save the guy some money!

PBB


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 20 March 2002 00:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC


Agreed, however, I never speculated about anything. I merely stated that
this message box is generally caused by network congestion and that IF this
was the culprit in John's case, to call PSS for the solution. That's why I
prefaced it the way I did.

Note that he said there are only 25 on this particular server, not on his
whole network. He did not say how many users are on the network. I have no
idea how much traffic is on the segment his E2K box resides on, or on his
network as a whole. He hasn't provided that information.

I mentioned what I did because this is known to be caused by network
congestion and other connectivity based issues. As I said, IF this is caused
by network congestion, the fix is a few registry settings that must be
obtained from PSS (unless you are under an MS NDA, in which case you can get
the info from MPO).

I figured that since I was aware, I would mention it so that if John
confirmed the cause was network congestion, he'd know there was a potential
solution available for that particular scenario.

Tom.

-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Bouzan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 7:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC

John has 25 users and I would hate to speculate on what is causing the
network congestion!  

I have 400 users over thirty sites and PSS is not even an option yet until I
have checked the cable etc.  See my previous post.

PBB
~ndi


-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Di Nardo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: 20 March 2002 00:09
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: promoting E2K to a DC


This is usually caused by network congestion. You can run a netmon trace to
confirm this is the cause in your case. If that's what's causing the problem
in your case, you can call PSS and get some information for registry changes
to tune the length of time that will pass before the message box is
presented or disable it altogether. 

Tom.

-----Original Message-----
From: John Q Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 2:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: promoting E2K to a DC

I have a E2K, SP2 box that continues to give "Requesting data from Exchange
server" errors to users. All users are using OLK2002. I have tried
everything I know. To no avail. I have also tried to reset the OLK clients,
still an issues. It's odd it seams to rotate, one day a user will work fine
and then not, then a nother user will expirence the same isse. I would think
it's a load issue, but w/ only 25 users on this ssytem, there is no way.
Even checked w Prof monitor. 1GB mem, dual 550 Procs, 36 GB of free space So
I am thinking it's an issue with E2K DC communication. So my fix is to
promote the E2K Server to a DC w/ a GC on it. Any reason I should not?

Thank You,
 - John Q Jr.


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to