Who wins, you or Claire? > -----Original Message----- > From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 03 April 2002 10:53 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > Particularly during the play-wrestle with the wife > > --------------------------------------------- > Tristan Gayford > Deputy Systems & Network Manager > Cranfield University at Silsoe > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Harford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: 03 April 2002 10:40 > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > And get paid for it. Result! > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: 03 April 2002 10:39 > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > Overtime? > > > > You lean over to your laptop on the coffee table at home connected > > over the VPN or TS session and select a block of mailboxes > and select > > move mailbox and return to the NCAA basketball game or > whatever. An > > hour later, you select the next block, then take the dog > for a walk. > > Return home, then select the next block and play-wrestle > with the wife > > for awhile. Select the next block, and it's dinnertime. > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 12:23 AM > > To: Exchange Discussions > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > It's fairly poor use of overtime, as I see it, watching mailboxes > > slowly move between servers. So rather than doing a lot of > overtime, > > over several days, I prefer to do the whole job in one day. And if > > I'm going to do the job in one day, I prefer the backup & restore > > method which is quicker, and if you know what you are > doing, it is not > > risky. > > Actually my method is the off-line copy and quicker still > > than doing a backup and restore. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Tristan Gayford [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 03 April 2002 10:16 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > > > Why only between 7am and 8am? Surely if you need to move > them, a bit > > > of overtime is in order to limit the downtime to the users. Plus > > > with only 15GB, it could be easily done in a weekend with > no impact > > > to the end users and as you point out, would be much less risky. > > > > > > Tris > > > > > > --------------------------------------------- > > > Tristan Gayford > > > Deputy Systems & Network Manager > > > Cranfield University at Silsoe > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: 03 April 2002 08:52 > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > > > No, I work 8x5 like the rest of the 4000 staff in my organization > > > and so opportunities to move mailboxes are in a small > window in the > > > mornings between 7am and 8am, before users arrive. That does not > > > give a lot of time to move users, and moving a mailbox > of, say, 100 > > > MB can take some time. Try moving 500 mailboxes with an > average of > > > 30 MB each and I think you'll find it takes longer than a > backup and > > > restore. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: 28 March 2002 16:57 > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > > > > > > Do you work 24x7? Because assuming a 12 hour window on a > > Friday and > > > > Saturday night I could probably move around 30-40GB on > a LAN and > > > > actual impact to any single user would likely be only a > matter of > > > > minutes. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, March 28, 2002 8:25 AM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Over 500. > > > > > > > > > > Mailboxes can't be moved during working hours.... > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: 26 March 2002 20:12 > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Months to move? How many mailboxes are we talking here? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Rowell, John (AFIT) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:32 AM > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > While the Ed Crowley Server Move method is very > > > > effective, I would > > > > > > not discount the backup and restore method, where you do > > > > the whole > > > > > > move within one day. I've used the Ed Crawley Server > > > Move method > > > > > > and it works fine, but the downside is that it can take > > > months to > > > > > > move the mailboxes, if you have a lot of them, and if > > > > they are big. > > > > > > As a result, recently I used the server move method, and > > > > had great > > > > > > success, it was finished in one day and was much cleaner. I > > > > > > wouldn't say it's that risky, as long as you know how to > > > > back out of > > > > > > it. > > > > > > There are also two types of move, i) using one-line backup & > > > > > > restore, ii) using off-line backup & restore, and I > found the > > > > > > latter easier. > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > > From: Roger Seielstad > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > Sent: 25 > March 2002 18:14 > > > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > > > Subject: RE: Moving Exchange 5.5 to new hardware > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > This e-mail (and any attachments) is confidential and may > contain personal views which are not the views of the BBC > unless specifically stated. If you have received it in error, > please delete it from your system, do not use, copy or > disclose the information in any way nor act in reliance on it > and notify the sender immediately. > Please note that the BBC monitors e-mails sent > or received. Further communication will signify your consent to this. > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
-- This e-mail is intended for the addressee shown. It contains information that is confidential and protected from disclosure. Any review, dissemination or use of this transmission or its contents by persons or unauthorized employees of the intended organisations is strictly prohibited. The contents of this email do not necessarily represent the views or policies of Luton Sixth Form College, its employees or students. _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
