Oh... Don will need a few beers before the fist round. -----Original Message----- From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 5:56 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Full access
OK. I see you at MEC2002 and I pay the fist round. /Peter ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 8:03 PM Subject: RE: Full access > Yes we do! Beers all around! :o) > > -------------------------------------------- > Don Ely > Network Engineer > Tripath Imaging, Inc. > (336) 290-8293 - Direct > (336) 516-4519 - Mobile > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email > http://www.tripathimaging.com > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:17 PM > To: Exchange Discussions > Subject: Re: Full access > > > OK, OK I need a beer. > > Don, we have a draw here :) > > /Peter > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Tom Meunier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 7:04 PM > Subject: RE: Full access > > > Recipient containers in E2K? > > (sorry, I just had to...) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Peter Szabo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Posted At: Thursday, April 11, 2002 05:53 PM > > Posted To: MSExchange Mailing List > > Conversation: Full access > > Subject: Re: Full access > > > > > > Service account in E2K ? > > > > I can think of a couple of scenarios when one need to use > > exmerge on a production box: 1. User A is transferred from > > site A to site B 2. The previous admin was stupid and set-up > > recipient containers ( It wasn't you of course ;)) > > > > /Peter > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ely, Don" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:38 PM > > Subject: RE: Full access > > > > > > > Then use the service account. I would imagine, all the > > access needed > > > it there. > > > > > > And how often does one run Exmerge? > > > > > > -------------------------------------------- > > > Don Ely > > > Network Engineer > > > Tripath Imaging, Inc. > > > (336) 290-8293 - Direct > > > (336) 516-4519 - Mobile > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] - email http://www.tripathimaging.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Andrey Fyodorov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:17 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Full access > > > > > > > > > Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. > > That's when > > > you need to have full access to everyone's mailbox. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > Subject: RE: Full access > > > > > > > > > Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices. > > > > > > 1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled. > > > 2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for > > day to day > > work. > > > 3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but > > that doesn't > > > mean that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those > > > users should be part of an Exchange admins group. 4. Users with the > > > ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the > > smallest group > > > of users possible. > > > > > > I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch. > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Full access > > > > > > > > > > > > Why is this a bad design? > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 12:52 PM > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > Subject: RE: Full access > > > > > > > > > > > > Asked and answered at least once this week already I > > think. Q258183. > > > > I'll skip the diatribe on what a bad design that > > particular question > > > > implies. > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:46 AM > > > > > To: Exchange Discussions > > > > > Subject: Full access > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > What is the best way to give Domain Admins full access to > > > > all PFs and > > > > > Mailboxes in Exchange2k? > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > _________________________________________________________________ > List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm > Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp > To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _________________________________________________________________ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
