I am cute dammit!

-----Original Message-----
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 4:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access


Yes, the mellow ones are when I don't hit send.

I didn't even get into the exporting of bad messages, or suspected
virus-laden messages retrievable by subject, or the like.

If I were only allowed a single tool outside of the basic installation, it
would probably be ExMerge.

I also don't buy into Mr Strome's subtle self-depricating cute humbleness.
He is very capable.

And I AM being mellow, Damnit! 

-----Original Message-----
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:54 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access


Have you never been mellow?
Have you never tried?


-----Original Message-----
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 6:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access


I started with 5.0.  I've used ExMerge consistently on production boxes.  It
is a valuable tool.

You've never walked into a client that had setup an otherwise decent
Exchange installation, but used a recipients container per department?
You've never tried to retrieve as much data as possible from a corrupt
information store?  I've even used it to move a couple of mailboxes between
Admin groups in Exchange 2000 (mixed mode).  Extracting data from another
company's remote exchange box (not sufficiently locked down) for future
blackmailings (thanks, Tener.). 

I'm glad you never had a reason to.  Are you still on 4.0?  Just kidding.

William

-----Original Message-----
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:32 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access


Yikes I'm with Missy on this one.  I have been doing exchange since it was a
fledgling beta called 4.0  I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a
production box.

-----Original Message-----
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access


My guess is she has minions do it.


-----Original Message-----
From: David Strome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 2:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access


You have the great fortune of knowing what you're doing...


-----Original Message-----
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:20 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Full access


Sometimes?  Sometimes when?  I have NEVER needed to use exmerge on a
production box, and I have a been around Exchange for years and years.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Andrey Fyodorov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Exchange Discussions" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 4:16 PM
Subject: RE: Full access


Sometimes you need to export everyone's mail with ExMerge. That's when
you
need to have full access to everyone's mailbox.

-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Full access


Runs counter to several things I would consider best practices.

1. Domain Admin accounts should not be mailbox enabled.
2. Users should be logging in as domain admin accounts for day to day
work.
3. All Domain Admins might also be Exchange Admins, but that doesn't
mean
that the rights should be applied to that group, rather those users
should
be part of an Exchange admins group.
4. Users with the ability to log into mailboxes should be limited to the
smallest group of users possible.

I'm sure there are others, but I'm hungry and headed out for lunch.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 11:56 AM
> To: Exchange Discussions
> Subject: RE: Full access
>
>
> Why is this a bad design?
>
>

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
The information contained in this email message is privileged and
confidential information intended only for the use of the individual or
entity to whom it is addressed.  If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this message is strictly prohibited.  If you have
received this email in error, please immediately notify Veronis Suhler
Stevenson by telephone (212)935-4990, fax (212)381-8168, or email
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) and delete the message.  Thank you.

============================================================================
==


_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to