Chris,

Currently all of our _wonderful_ users depend on the containers to help
them figure out who's at a center or to send email to everyone at that
center and we do not use address book views at this time.  We have a high
transfer rate here and every time some moves from one center to another I
have to move that mailbox.  Also we're 62 centers strong and are looking
at adding 30 more centers before the end of this year.  The container's
are a pain right now and will become a nightmare by the end of the year. 
Also, my boss doesn't like it and I have to give him what he wants....  I
just wish his previous staff set it up correctly.

Now, if we drill everyone down to the root anytime I have a new user hire
or a transfer I just need to change the information in their profile and
can manage all the mailbox resources via an address book view instead of
hard moves and complicated scripting.


> Question: Why do you need to move the users to a single container?
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:52 PM
> > To: Exchange Discussions
> > Subject: RE: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
> > 
> > 
> > Chris and Martin,
> > 
> > Thanks for the information. *sigh* My manager's going to hate 
> > me. But that's what a test lab is for right?
> > 
> > As for E2K,
> > 
> > I've yet to really look at it as a possabiliy so my first 
> > question is...
> > 
> > Can I run E2K is it own domain with a DC blah blah blah...  
> > Leaving my current NT 4 domain intact and setup a trust 
> > between the 2 domains, add the E2K server to my current site 
> > and move all the users to it?
> > 
> > We're not quite ready to move to 2000 yet so I need to work 
> > between the lines.
> > 
> > > Upgrade to E2K.
> > > 
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: David Gibbons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 4:38 PM
> > > > To: Exchange Discussions
> > > > Subject: Information Store and Single Instance Storage.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > To All:
> > > > 
> > > > Current environment....
> > > > 
> > > > Test Lab Server 1
> > > > Compaq r3000
> > > > 2 PII 333
> > > > 1.5gig Ram
> > > > 1x 4.1gig OS mirror
> > > > 1x 9.1gig Log mirror
> > > > 4x 18.1gig Information Store Raid 5
> > > > Windows NT 4sp6
> > > > Exchange 5.5sp4
> > > > Information Store Size 33.2gig (Single Instance) 51gig
> > > > uncompressed. 768 mailboxes in information store Container 
> > > > Scheme Container for each location e.g.  -Center Location 1  
> > > > --User  --User  --ETC  -Center Location 2  --User  --User  --Etc
> > > > 
> > > > Test Lab Server 2
> > > > Compaq ML530
> > > > 2 PIII Xoen 1gig
> > > > 2gig Ram
> > > > 1x 18.1gig OS Mirror
> > > > 1x 18.1gig Log Mirror
> > > > 4x 36gig Information Store Raid 5
> > > > Windows 2000sp2
> > > > Exchange 5.5sp4
> > > > 
> > > > We wish to use Ed's server move method to replace the current
> > > > hardware that our exchange server is sitting.  We also wish 
> > > > to move all user out of there current containers and set them 
> > > > in the root of the exchange server and use address book views 
> > > > for our GAL(ie the right way)  Within Ed's server move method 
> > > > I can use the server to server move and not lose single 
> > > > instance store (according to Microsoft Q white papers) with 
> > > > all email on the old server and retain my 33.2gig database on 
> > > > the new server.  As soon as I use Bind view or exmerge to get 
> > > > all the mailboxes out of there containers and into the root I 
> > > > lose single instance store and have a 50gig database on the 
> > > > new server.  Does anyone know how to move mailboxes out of 
> > > > their containers and into the root without having to use a 
> > > > .pst and losing single instance storage?
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > David Gibbons
> > > > Sr. Network Engineer
> > > > Caliber Collision Centers
> > > > 949-283-7593
> > > > 
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > > > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > > > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > >
> > 
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
> > Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
> > To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >

_________________________________________________________________
List posting FAQ:       http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:               http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:         mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Exchange List admin:    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to